OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Trump Waives Graham Russia Sanctions Drawing Mixed GOP Views

5 sources · updated 2026-10-19
Left 60% Center 0% Right 40%
3 left · 0 center · 2 right

What happened

President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Friday waiving sanctions on Russian energy enacted under the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act, legislation championed by the late Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). The waiver followed a deal Trump struck with Russian President Vladimir Putin to lift an embargo on Russian diesel. Sen. Darline Graham (R-S.C.), appointed to fill her late brother's Senate seat, said Saturday she would prefer to keep the sanctions in place; Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) praised the waiver the same day. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent defended the decision on NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky criticized the move.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 5 articles

5 of 5 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 5 of 5
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Senator Darline Graham, Sen. Lindsey Graham, Rep. Thomas Massie, The White House and Scott Bessent
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 5
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
Credits another outlet 0 of 5
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 5
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 17, 18:32 UTC by Washington Examiner, naming its source.
Not counted 0
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Right-leaning coverage supplies a reason for the waiver that left-leaning coverage never reports. The Washington Examiner says Trump waived the sanctions after a deal with Vladimir Putin to lift the embargo on Russian diesel. That account also ties the order to lower energy prices ahead of the midterms. The Hill's account of the order itself stops at a waiver of sanctions on Russian energy. Left-leaning and right-leaning coverage each put a different Republican in the lead and omit the other. The Hill centers Darline Graham's preference to keep sanctions pressure on Russia. The Washington Examiner centers Thomas Massie's approval and Scott Bessent's claim that "no one has been tougher." Readers of either side never see both GOP reactions at once. Does the statute allow the president to pause its sanctions by executive order, and for how long?
Bottom line

Read the New York Times and the waiver is Darline Graham breaking with Trump over her brother's law; read the Washington Examiner and it is a Putin diesel deal aimed at energy prices before the midterms.

The receipts — 3 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Darline Graham was appointed to fill the Senate seat of her late brother Lindsey contextin New York Times · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Lindsey Graham championed the penalties as a measure designed to support Ukraine in its war against Moscow contextin Washington Examiner · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Darline Graham said she and the president share the same goal of ending the war and getting gas and diesel prices down official statementin The Hill · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
Left-leaning outlets cast the episode as a Republican split over a law tied to the late senator's legacy. The New York Times said Sen. Darline Graham "gently disagreed" with exempting Russia from the sanctions "her brother championed." The Hill quoted her saying, "I would choose to keep the pressure on Russia," that she "look[ed] forward to talking to him," and that while she and the president "share the same goal, which is to end the war, get gas and diesel prices down," the sanctions bill is "one of the tools we can use."
The Right View
Right-leaning coverage framed the waiver as toughness and flexibility, not retreat, and stressed unusual GOP backing. The Washington Examiner highlighted Massie's "rare praise" and "rare approval" of Trump for lifting penalties the late senator had championed "as a measure designed to support Ukraine in its war against Moscow." After what the Examiner called "fierce criticism" from Zelensky and both parties in Congress, Bessent said "no one has been tougher" on Russian sanctions than Trump and backed a "pause" on the Act, which the Examiner tied to lowering energy prices ahead of the midterm elections.
Our Take (balanced)
The left's strongest argument is intra-party and familial: the Republican now holding Lindsey Graham's seat says she would "choose to keep the pressure on Russia" and treats the Act her brother championed as a tool still needed to end the war. The right's strongest argument is that the waiver is consistent with maximum pressure and practical bargaining, citing Massie's unusual commendation and Bessent's claim that "no one has been tougher" than Trump, with the diesel arrangement offered as the mechanism for lower energy prices. The central unresolved tension is whether pausing the Graham Act uses presidential leverage to cut fuel costs and deal with Moscow, or surrenders congressional sanctions leverage that a Republican successor says should remain in force.

5 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.