OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Trump Attacks Abdul El-Sayed Over Alleged Muslim Brotherhood Ties

24 sources · updated 2026-10-31
Left 46% Center 12% Right 42%
11 left · 3 center · 10 right

What happened

Democrat Abdul El-Sayed, a physician born in Rochester Hills, Michigan, to Egyptian immigrant parents, is running against Republican Mike Rogers, a former FBI agent and congressman, in the 2026 race for the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by Sen. Gary Peters. President Donald Trump has called El-Sayed a "jihadist," referred to him as "Mohamed" and "Abdul Ramadan," and said he would "have to go through a metal detector before he's allowed to go into the Senate"; Rogers's closing ad charged that El-Sayed "has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood" and "publicly supported these terrorists," overlaying his image on Hamas footage. The associations cited include a 2012 letter El-Sayed signed as a Columbia medical student urging Egypt's then-president Mohamed Morsi to "purge the media and the police" of former-regime loyalists; 2012–2013 posts by El-Sayed's half-sister Eman Abdelhadi that "My family has long been MB (Muslim Brotherhood)" and that their mother was active in the group in 1970s Egypt; their mother Fatten Elkomy's work as a nurse at the Islamic American Relief Agency, which the FBI raided in 2004 and the Treasury and Justice Departments shut down for providing aid to al Qaeda and other terrorist groups, though Elkomy was not accused of wrongdoing; El-Sayed's 2003–2007 leadership in the University of Michigan Muslim Students' Association; father-in-law Tayeb Jukaku's past presidency of CAIR-Michigan and service on the Islamic Society of North America's founders' committee—both named as unindicted coconspirators, and not charged, in the 2007 Holy Land Foundation trial—and more than $300,000 in donations to the campaign; and a March 2026 appearance at the Islamic Center of Detroit. El-Sayed has said he has "never been a member of the Muslim Brotherhood," was not raised by his mother, that a resume listing of dual U.S.-Egyptian citizenship was a mistake, and, asked to disavow the Brotherhood, replied, "Sure, yeah, absolutely." A CBS Detroit poll showed El-Sayed ahead by 7 points as Election Day neared; in January 2026 the Trump administration designated several overseas Muslim Brotherhood chapters, including Egypt's, as foreign terrorist organizations.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 24 articles

11 of 20 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report. Abdul El-Sayed denied part of it on the record.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 11 of 20
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: President Trump, Donald Trump, David Beamer, Abdul El-Sayed, Bishara Bahbah and T.J. Wolfgram
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 2 of 20
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: undercover video, poll, interview
Credits another outlet 0 of 20
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 20
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
On-record denial 2
A named person or institution says the claim, or part of it, is not true. It is on the record — someone signed their name to it — but it is not confirmation, so it never counts toward On the record. Criticizing or dissenting from a decision is not a denial. The count is how many people or institutions deny it; each is listed with the first article that carried the denial. Here: Abdul El-Sayed (The Guardian, Oct 26, 15:54 UTC); Abdul El-Sayed campaign (CBS News, Oct 29, 14:42 UTC)
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 25, 21:14 UTC by Breitbart, naming its source. First document 17 hours later, from Daily Wire (undercover video).
Not counted 4
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Right-leaning coverage presents a 2012 letter El-Sayed signed as proof of Muslim Brotherhood ties without reporting that the letter never names the group. The Guardian says the text "does not even mention the Muslim Brotherhood" and was an appeal to Egypt's elected president to purge Mubarak-era police. Daily Wire describes the same letter as an appeal to Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood president to purge the media and police. Left-leaning coverage treats that missing name as the core of a false charge; right-leaning coverage never flags it. The Guardian's headline calls it a "Muslim Brotherhood lie." A Daily Wire column says calling him a jihadist is "fair play." Left-leaning coverage treats the language as smear; right-leaning coverage treats it as a fair label. Did El-Sayed himself ever join the Muslim Brotherhood, or do the alleged ties stop at relatives and a letter to Morsi?
Bottom line

The Guardian's defense is that a 2012 letter never names the Muslim Brotherhood; Daily Wire cites the same letter as an appeal to the Brotherhood's president and never reports those missing words.

The receipts — 4 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • The 2012 letter El-Sayed signed does not mention the Muslim Brotherhood. contextin The Guardian · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • El-Sayed said he was not raised by his mother and that her reported Brotherhood past does not give him ties to the group. official statementin The Guardian · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • El-Sayed's CV listed American and Egyptian citizenship; his campaign says that claim was a mistake. contextin The Daily Wire · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • El-Sayed appeared at the Islamic Center of Detroit, where a speaker prayed for the worst revenge on Zionists; footage did not show whether he stayed for the prayer. individual casein The Daily Wire · absent from left-leaning coverage
The Left View
Left-leaning sources frame the attacks as anti-Muslim smears built on a falsehood. The Guardian, after reviewing the evidence, calls the Brotherhood charge a "lie" first advanced by Trump adviser Laura Loomer—who calls herself "a proud Islamophobe"—when El-Sayed entered politics in 2018, because the 2012 letter "does not even mention the Muslim Brotherhood" and is not a "pledge" of support. Egyptian journalist Hossam el-Hamalawy told the Guardian the letter "makes no reference to the Muslim Brotherhood" and that Al-Ahram's "Morsi's supporters" headline was the editors', not the signatories'; he said the American right is "borrowing directly from the playbook of Arab authoritarian regimes" that portray demands for democratic change as "inherently Islamist-driven." Politico reported that El-Sayed's allies fear Trump's "anti-Muslim attacks" are reaching undecided voters; El-Sayed brushed them off as "desperate, bad faith attacks" and compared the questioning to 1960 fears about John F. Kennedy's Catholicism. The Guardian argues the Brotherhood is a political and social group with no armed wing and is not on the State Department Foreign Terrorist Organizations list, notes that Rogers in 2012 said the United States could "reach out to and talk to" moderate Brotherhood members, and presents the Hamas-overlay ad and Rogers's debate claim that El-Sayed asked "Morrissey" to "defund the police" as mischaracterizations meant to turn faith and family history into a national-security threat.
The Right View
Right-leaning outlets argue the "jihadist" label is warranted. Daily Wire columnist Stephen Kent told the BBC that calling El-Sayed a jihadist is "fair play" and "a legitimate concern," because El-Sayed has not offered "a very clear layout of what kind of Islamic terrorism he objects to" and because jihad, in the Brotherhood's 1991 "Explanatory Memorandum" entered in the Holy Land Foundation case, includes a "Civilization-Jihadist Process" of "eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within" via politics and media—not only suicide attacks. The Federalist listed five reasons Americans "should be concerned": the Brotherhood's founding goal that Islam "dominate" and "impose its law on all nations"; incremental institutional capture; the weaponization of "Islamophobia" charges to block scrutiny, which it says El-Sayed has used; Brotherhood backgrounds among 9/11 figures; and a "Red-Green Alliance" of leftists and Islamists. Daily Wire reported El-Sayed sought votes at the Islamic Center of Detroit the same day a speaker prayed for "the worst revenge" upon "the Zionists," and that the center has hosted speakers calling America the "House of Shaitan" and asking God to "grant victory to ... the mujahideen"; an undercover video showed Rep. Rashida Tlaib dismissing dual-citizenship and Brotherhood questions as bigotry. They present the half-sister posts, the Morsi letter's purge demand, MSA and CAIR/ISNA family networks, and mosque appearances as "numerous links" El-Sayed has "struggled to convince anyone" are not sympathetic to Brotherhood goals.
Our Take (balanced)
The left's strongest argument is documentary: the 2012 letter does not name the Muslim Brotherhood, El-Sayed has denied membership and disavowed the group on camera, and several cited links run through an estranged mother's distant student activism, a half-sister's decade-old posts, uncharged affiliations of a father-in-law, and a campus association that a George Washington University extremism scholar has said was not a "pure" Brotherhood organization. The right's strongest argument is the accumulated record they compile—family members' own descriptions of Brotherhood involvement, the mother's job at a charity the U.S. closed for aiding al Qaeda, a letter backing Morsi's purge of Egypt's security organs, in-law and student-group networks named in the Holy Land Foundation case, and a campaign stop at a mosque where speakers prayed for "the worst revenge" on "the Zionists"—plus El-Sayed's, in their telling, lack of a "very clear layout of what kind of Islamic terrorism he objects to." The central unresolved tension is whether that web of family statements, organizational histories, and appearances amounts to politically relevant "ties" to the Muslim Brotherhood, or whether treating it as such converts ordinary facts of a Muslim immigrant family and civic life into a loyalty test.

24 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.