OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Trump Criticizes LeBron James for Disrespecting National Anthem

4 sources · updated 2026-10-23
Left 50% Center 0% Right 50%
2 left · 0 center · 2 right

What happened

On Tuesday, before the Philadelphia 76ers’ NBA season opener against the New York Knicks at Madison Square Garden, cameras showed LeBron James making golf-swing and basketball-shooting motions while a performer sang the national anthem; teammates lined up beside him mostly stood with little movement. On Thursday, President Donald Trump posted the clip on Truth Social, writing that “While listening to our National Anthem, LeBron James disrespects our Country,” calling James “a TOTAL DISGRACE,” and saying he “should apologize to all of those Great American Warriors and Heroes who died for the American Flag, and all that our Country stands for.” After a later 76ers game against the Cleveland Cavaliers, James said of the criticism, “It must be a slow news day at the office.” Coach Nick Nurse called the comments the kind of “outside noise” he wanted the team to ignore. Trump and James have publicly criticized each other since the 2016 presidential campaign.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 4 articles

3 of 3 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 3 of 3
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Donald Trump, LeBron James and Nick Nurse
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 2 of 3
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: social media post, video
Credits another outlet 0 of 3
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 3
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 22, 20:04 UTC by BBC, naming its source. First document in the first report, from BBC (social media post).
Not counted 1
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Right-leaning coverage never reports that James answered the president at all, so the charge of disrespect sits unanswered for those readers. The reply in the Guardian was that it must be a "slow news day" after a later game in Philadelphia. Daily Wire stops at the demand that he apologize and never prints a word from James about the anthem clip itself. The same clip is a warm-up on one side and a snub on the other, a split that decides whether the reader sees a fidget or a slight. The Guardian describes "apparent warm-up movements." Daily Wire says he "couldn't even manage to stand still and show a little respect for Old Glory." What do NBA rules actually say about moving during the anthem?
Bottom line

If you only read Daily Wire, James never answers Trump on the anthem clip at all.

The receipts — 4 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • James said the criticism must be a slow news day at the office after a later game official statementin Guardian · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • James's teammates mostly remained standing with minimal movement during the anthem contextin BBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Trump called the episode a big scandal kind of a story at a campaign rally in Iowa official statementin Guardian · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Players and spectators are expected to stand for the anthem, if they can, and refrain from moving around contextin BBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
Left-leaning outlets present Trump’s post as another volley in a long personal feud and as part of a pattern of targeting athletes—particularly Black athletes—over anthem behavior, citing his earlier attacks on Colin Kaepernick’s 2016 kneel against police brutality and racism. The BBC notes that remaining still is customary but has become a “political flash-point,” and recaps earlier clashes in which Trump suggested James was not intelligent and James said Trump gave racists “an opportunity to be out and outspoken without fear” and tied Trump’s rhetoric to the January 6, 2021 Capitol attack. The Guardian foregrounds James’s shrug and Nurse’s “outside noise” line, and reports that Trump, at an Iowa rally, called the episode “a big scandal kind of a story.”
The Right View
Right-leaning outlets frame James’s motions as a refusal to “stand still and show a little respect for Old Glory,” with Daily Wire saying he “treated the Star-Spangled Banner like a warm-up routine” and that he is “at it again.” They place the clip in a longer pattern of James “slamming America while raking in tens of millions of dollars,” citing his 2022 question of whether detained WNBA player Brittney Griner would even want to return to the United States, January 2021 comments that the country looked like a “third-, fourth-, fifth-world country,” and his Nike-linked wealth. Daily Wire argues that “no matter how much wealth and privilege America gives him, James will always find a reason to trash the court he plays on.” Breitbart reports that some social media users backed the call for an apology and said a star of James’s stature should set an example.
Our Take (balanced)
The left’s strongest argument is that a few seconds of pregame movement is being recast as national betrayal by a president with a documented personal feud and a record of turning anthem conduct—especially by Black athletes—into political combat, a reading supported by James’s shrug, Nurse’s “outside noise” framing, and Trump’s own “big scandal” language. The right’s strongest argument is that the anthem is a public ritual in which stillness is the expected sign of respect, that video shows James moving through it while teammates did not, and that a franchise face who has repeatedly criticized the country can reasonably be asked to apologize to those who died for the flag. The central unresolved tension is whether those motions count as disrespect of the country at all, or whether treating them as a national disgrace is itself the political act.

4 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.