Trump comments on Nicki Minaj derriere at Michigan rally
Left 33%
Center 0%
Right 67%
1 left · 0 center · 2 right
What happened
On Sunday, President Donald Trump spoke at a campaign rally in Michigan supporting Republican Senate candidate Mike Rogers against Democrat Abdul El-Sayed. Rapper Nicki Minaj attended after being seen walking with Trump from Air Force One. Revisiting earlier rally remarks in which he said he had examined Ohio Republican Sen. Jon Husted’s physique—including his rear end—after learning Husted was a former University of Dayton football player, Trump said, “By the way, I looked at one hell of a beautiful ass before – Nicki Minaj,” asked her to stand, and added that he hoped she was not insulted and that “we love Nicki.” Husted, who is running against Democrat Sherrod Brown, later told Fox News he took the comments in stride and joked that he needed to keep working out.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 3 articles
2 of 3 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 2 of 3
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Jon Husted and Donald Trump
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 3
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
- Credits another outlet 0 of 3
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
- Unnamed sources 0 of 3
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 25, 15:38 UTC by New York Post, naming its source.
- Not counted 0
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
Left-leaning coverage never reports that Minaj delivered a speech at the rally, so a reader cannot tell she was a featured ally on the program rather than a spectator being rated. Right-leaning coverage in the Washington Examiner places the remark before she gave a speech and has her standing and waving. The same left-leaning account in the Guardian records Trump telling her to stand and hoping she was not insulted, without ever stating that she addressed the crowd.
Left-leaning coverage leads with a Michigan rally for Mike Rogers and then Minaj. Right-leaning coverage in the New York Post leads with Husted's reaction to the earlier body talk and never names Minaj.
What did Minaj say from the stage, or later, about the line?
Bottom line
The Washington Examiner is the only one of these outlets that reports Minaj gave a speech after Trump's line about her body. The New York Post's write-up of the anatomical cracks never mentions her.
The receipts — 3 facts one side's coverage lacks
- Minaj gave a speech at the Detroit rally after Trump's remark
- Trump said of looking at bodies that off the record it was women yes, men no
- The White House did not respond to a request for comment on why Trump has been discussing others' bodies
The Left View
The Guardian framed the Michigan remarks as Trump reiterating an “apparent love for buxom bums” and as “cheeky comments” he “couldn’t resist” even while there to back a Senate candidate. It placed the episode amid criticism of his language style, which “some have likened to grotesquerie,” noted that the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment about why he has been discussing others’ bodies, and highlighted that he dismissed earlier media attention to the Husted comments as “fake news” while insisting they were “in fun” and athletic in context.
The Right View
Right-leaning coverage treated the remarks as jokes and compliments the named people did not reject. The New York Post led with Husted saying he “doesn’t mind being the butt” of the jokes and quoting him that the praise made him tell his wife he had to hit the gym to “keep up my reputation,” while also noting Trump’s claim that Husted rose in the polls after “he said the A-word.” The Washington Examiner reported the Minaj line drawing “roaring applause” as she stood and waved before speaking, presenting it as a crowd-pleasing aside rather than a controversy.
Our Take (balanced)
The left’s strongest argument is that a president repeatedly describing people’s bodies—including using “ass” about both a senator and a performer at a campaign event—fits a pattern critics call grotesque, and that the White House offered no explanation for why he keeps doing it. The right’s strongest argument is that Husted publicly laughed it off as athletic-family banter and that Minaj was present, stood on cue, and the crowd cheered, which they treat as evidence the lines landed as jokes, not slights. The unresolved tension is whether the targets’ non-objection and rally applause make the comments ordinary campaign ribbing, or whether repeated anatomical commentary from a president remains crude regardless of how those named respond.
3 sources
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.