Trump Campaigns Aggressively Ahead of Midterms
Left 50%
Center 0%
Right 50%
1 left · 0 center · 1 right
What happened
President Donald Trump has been holding a cross-country series of campaign rallies ahead of the midterm elections, spoke both nights at the first Republican midterm convention last month in Dallas, and pledged $5,000 to voters if Republicans hold Congress. Political groups associated with him have spent at least about $277 million since September 1 to help Republican candidates, while MAGA Inc., his Super PAC, began last month with $416 million; the administration also used taxpayer funding for television ads celebrating him. Trump has mostly appeared in reliably Republican states and in conservative areas of battlegrounds, telling the Washington Examiner, “I always cater to my base.” An AP-NORC poll in late September found that 17 percent of U.S. adults approved of his handling of the cost of living; a mid-October CNN/SSRS poll found that about 4 in 10 registered voters said their congressional vote would send a message opposing him, versus about 2 in 10 supporting him.
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
Right-leaning coverage never mentions how unpopular the president is, so a reader cannot tell whether the red-district rallies help with turnout or hurt the party. Left-leaning coverage in ABC News centers that problem, citing an AP-NORC poll that found only 17 percent of adults approve of Trump's handling of the cost of living. It also notes that Republicans still love him even as those ratings threaten the party's hold on Congress. Right-leaning coverage in the Washington Examiner reports a strategy to fire up low-propensity voters and stops without any measure of public standing.
The same visits get opposite labels. Left-leaning coverage calls the tour a "self-involved appeal." Right-leaning coverage calls those visits a "considered strategy."
Do the safe-district rallies actually raise turnout among infrequent Republican voters?
Bottom line
The Washington Examiner covers Trump's midterm rallies as a turnout plan for infrequent voters and never reports the 17 percent cost-of-living approval that ABC News puts at the center of the same story.
The receipts — 4 facts one side's coverage lacks
- Just 17% of U.S. adults approve of Trump's handling of the cost of living, per an AP-NORC poll in late September
- Trump used taxpayer funding to run television ads celebrating himself
- White House spokesperson Davis Ingle called Trump the unequivocal leader, best messenger, and unmatched motivator for the Republican Party
- Byron York said Trump's visits to deep red districts aim to energize low-propensity voters
The Left View
ABC News frames the tour as a self-focused gamble, highlighting Trump’s line that voters should “pretend I’m on the ballot” and his personal branding, including Marlboro Man imagery at the convention. Jessica Mackler of EMILY’s List said Democratic candidates want him on the trail because “we look at that as a win,” and Michigan pollster Richard Czuba said he is “literally driving people who disagree with him to the Democratic side,” adding that “the dividing line is how voters feel about Donald Trump.” The piece notes that a similar 2018 rally barrage did not prevent Democrats from retaking the House, argues that cost-of-living discontent could turn prior campaign strengths into liabilities, and says Trump’s backing of Ken Paxton over Sen. John Cornyn in Texas and his clash with Sen. Tom Tillis—who then retired, after which Trump pushed Michael Whatley to run in North Carolina—have made those seats more competitive.
The Right View
Washington Examiner chief political correspondent Byron York, speaking on The Hugh Hewitt Show, described Trump’s appearances in deep-red districts as a “considered strategy” to energize “low-propensity voters.” York said midterms are “normally sleepy” but that Trump has “a tremendous power to fire up people.”
Our Take (balanced)
The left’s strongest case is that nationalizing the midterms around Trump historically and in current polling favors the opposition: ABC cites 2018, Mackler’s claim that rallies help Democrats, Czuba’s warning that he is pushing dissenters to the other party, and the CNN/SSRS split in which opposition message-voters outnumber support message-voters two to one. The right’s strongest case, from Byron York, is that midterms are “normally sleepy” and that concentrating Trump in safe red districts is a “considered strategy” to activate “low-propensity voters,” given his “tremendous power to fire up people.” The central unresolved tension is whether energizing infrequent Republican voters in already-safe areas will outweigh the risk of turning the election into a referendum on Trump among the larger share of voters who, per the cited polls, disapprove of him.
2 sources
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.