OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Democrat Scott Colom Elected Mississippi's First Black Senator Since Reconstruction

66 sources · updated 2026-11-14
Cindy Hyde-Smith
Photo: U.S. Congress (public domain) · file · licence
Left 70% Center 18% Right 12%
46 left · 12 center · 8 right

What happened

On 11 November 2026, the Associated Press projected that Democrat Scott Colom, a 43‑year‑old district attorney and seventh‑generation Mississippian, had narrowly defeated Republican Sen. Cindy Hyde‑Smith in Mississippi’s U.S. Senate race after days of counting absentee and provisional ballots. Colom won about 49.2% to Hyde‑Smith’s 48.7%, a margin of roughly 4,700 votes out of more than 960,000 cast, flipping a seat in a state that Donald Trump carried by about 23 points in the 2024 presidential election. His victory makes him the first Democrat elected to the Senate from Mississippi since 1982 and the state’s first Black U.S. senator since the Reconstruction era, when Hiram Revels and Blanche K. Bruce served after being chosen by the legislature. The upset gives Democrats at least 55 seats in the 100‑member Senate, with only Alaska’s race still outstanding, and ends Hyde‑Smith’s eight‑year tenure as a Trump‑aligned incumbent. According to the established provenance, the Associated Press first reported Colom’s victory on 11 November, after Colom had told The Hill on 9 November that late‑counted ballots were "trending" his way; multiple outlets, including CNBC and Breitbart, later cited AP as the origin of the call and noted Hyde‑Smith’s concession phone call and video message.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 66 articles

32 of 49 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report. Scott Colom denied part of it on the record.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 32 of 49
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Scott Colom, Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith, NBC News, Chuck Schumer, The Associated Press and Bill Clinton
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 6 of 49
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: official statistics, election results, exit polling, official statement
Credits another outlet 2 of 49
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Associated Press
Unnamed sources 2 of 49
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
On-record denial 1
A named person or institution says the claim, or part of it, is not true. It is on the record — someone signed their name to it — but it is not confirmation, so it never counts toward On the record. Criticizing or dissenting from a decision is not a denial. The count is how many people or institutions deny it; each is listed with the first article that carried the denial. Here: Scott Colom (The Hill, Nov 13, 15:05 UTC)
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Nov 9, 22:27 UTC by The Hill, naming its source. First document 10 hours later, from Daily Wire (election results).
Not counted 17
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

The biggest gap is that right‑leaning coverage barely mentions the structural voting‑rights context that left‑leaning outlets treat as central to understanding the upset. Mother Jones and Axios tie Black turnout and Colom’s margin directly to the Supreme Court’s Louisiana v. Callais decision and Gov. Tate Reeves’ call to redraw districts to unseat Rep. Bennie Thompson, plus a large GOP‑backed voter‑roll purge; Fox News, Daily Wire, Breitbart and others acknowledge long counting and provisional ballots but omit these legal and policy drivers, so a reader never sees how fights over maps and access to the ballot helped fuel the surge that made the race competitive. A secondary pattern is an emphasis gap around Colom’s political profile. OAN and Daily Wire note that he pledged to "back law enforcement" and "secure the border," portraying a Democrat with some crossover positions, while left‑leaning narratives stress his civil‑rights symbolism and organizing roots but do not really acknowledge these departures from national party stereotypes. None of the coverage answers a basic question: now that Democrats hold 55 Senate seats, what specific voting‑rules or election‑administration changes, if any, will they try to advance for Mississippi’s restrictive system?
Bottom line

Left‑leaning outlets link Scott Colom’s roughly 4,700‑vote win to Callais‑era attacks on Black representation and intensive organizing, while right‑leaning outlets like Fox News and Daily Wire describe a "stunning" red‑state upset without really explaining how redistricting fights and voter purges helped make it possible.

The receipts — 6 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • The Supreme Court’s Louisiana v. Callais decision weakening the Voting Rights Act and Gov. Tate Reeves’ call to redraw maps to oust Black Rep. Bennie Thompson helped galvanize Black voters and sparked the largest civil‑rights protest in Mississippi in decades. contextin Mother Jones · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Republican Secretary of State Michael Watson removed roughly 1 in 9 voters from the rolls before the election using faulty credit data, contributing to large numbers of provisional (affidavit) ballots. contextin Mother Jones · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Black voters made up a larger share of the electorate than in 2024 and gave Colom about 97% of their votes, while turnout in majority‑Black counties reached about 87% of 2024 levels versus roughly 74% in majority‑white counties. numberin Mother Jones, Axios · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Colom campaigned on relatively moderate themes of backing law enforcement with better pay, securing the border, and enforcing immigration laws. contextin OAN · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Exit polls reported by NBC News and the BBC found majorities of Mississippi voters disapproved of Trump’s job performance and believed his tariffs and the Iran war hurt the economy. numberin NBC News, BBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Mississippi lacks early voting and online registration and severely limits absentee voting, placing it at or near the bottom nationally in ease of voting and past turnout. contextin Mother Jones · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
Left‑leaning coverage frames Colom’s win primarily as a civil‑rights milestone and a repudiation of decades of Jim Crow legacy and modern voter suppression in Mississippi. Outlets like Mother Jones and the Guardian emphasize that he is the first Black senator from Mississippi since the 1870s and the first Black person to win any statewide office there since Reconstruction, tying his election to sites of racist violence such as Emmett Till’s lynching and Medgar Evers’ assassination. They highlight record Black turnout, citing data that Black voters made up a larger share of the electorate than in 2024 and backed Colom overwhelmingly, and stress intensive grassroots organizing by groups like the NAACP and the Mississippi Black Women’s Roundtable in the wake of the Supreme Court’s Louisiana v. Callais decision and Gov. Tate Reeves’ push to redraw maps to weaken Black representation. Economically, they present the race as part of a national backlash against Trump’s tariffs and the war in Iran, arguing that voters punished Hyde‑Smith for supporting policies blamed for "high prices" while Colom’s messaging on affordability and Medicaid expansion and his viral "pick another protein" ad captured local anger and helped Democrats flip an improbably deep‑red seat.
The Right View
Right‑leaning coverage accepts the result as a "stunning" or "historic" upset in a reliably Republican state but largely interprets it through the lens of a broader anti‑Trump midterm wave and Hyde‑Smith’s campaign weaknesses rather than a structural ideological shift. Outlets such as the Daily Wire, Fox News, Breitbart, OAN, and the Daily Caller stress that Trump won Mississippi by nearly 23 points in 2024 and that Hyde‑Smith was a high‑profile Trump ally, so her loss underscores voter frustration with inflation and the Iran war, and disappointment that the "America First" agenda did not deliver lower costs. They foreground that Colom hammered Hyde‑Smith’s vote for Trump’s domestic package cutting Medicaid and her "pick another protein" remark about beef prices, while also noting attacks on Colom over contributions from organizations linked to George Soros and his past judicial nomination blocked by Hyde‑Smith. Several pieces underline his promises on pocketbook issues and also mention that he took relatively moderate positions on backing law enforcement and strengthening border enforcement, implicitly contrasting that with national Democrats and suggesting his personal brand and viral ads, plus late national money, mattered more than a durable partisan realignment of Mississippi.
Our Take (balanced)
The left’s strongest argument is that Colom’s victory is inseparable from Mississippi’s racial and voting‑rights history, and from contemporary fights over representation: Mother Jones and Axios present detailed evidence of record Black turnout, a near‑unanimous Black vote for Colom, years of restrictive voting rules and voter purges, and a direct mobilizing response to the Supreme Court’s Callais ruling and the governor’s plan to diminish Black‑majority districts. The right’s strongest argument is that the outcome reflects a uniquely hostile national environment for Trump and his allies and a weak incumbent, not a stable ideological shift: right‑leaning and centrist outlets alike report majority disapproval of Trump in exit polls, widespread belief that tariffs and the Iran war hurt the economy, and a narrow margin won by a candidate who campaigned on cost‑of‑living issues and some moderate themes in a deeply conservative state. The unresolved tension is whether Mississippi has entered a new era of multiracial Democratic competitiveness driven by durable organizing and demographic power, or whether Colom’s win is a one‑off product of specific economic conditions, an unpopular president, and an unusually effective challenger running against a damaged incumbent.

66 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.