OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Ted Bundy Linked by DNA to 1974 Utah Murder

6 sources · updated 2026-10-28
Left 33% Center 33% Right 33%
2 left · 2 center · 2 right

What happened

Utah law-enforcement officials announced that DNA evidence has linked serial killer Ted Bundy to the 1974 murder of 17-year-old Melissa Ann Smith, whose body hunters found on 27 October 1974. The identification followed Utah County’s April confirmation that Bundy killed another 17-year-old, Laura Ann Aime, that year after bodily fluid from Aime matched Bundy’s known DNA profile; a highly similar Y-STR DNA profile from Smith’s autopsy evidence then matched the Aime profile. Summit County Attorney Margaret Olson said the killing also showed Bundy’s pattern, motive, means and opportunity, and officials closed Smith’s case 52 years later. Bundy, executed in 1989, has been linked to at least 30 murders of women and girls across several U.S. states in the 1970s. Officials said they had contacted Smith’s next of kin, none of whom still live in the area.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 6 articles

6 of 6 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 6 of 6
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Utah County Sgt Mike Reynolds, Salt Lake County Sheriff Rosie Rivera, Summit County investigators, Salt Lake County investigators, Utah County investigators and Utah county sheriff’s office
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 4 of 6
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: DNA profiling, DNA evidence, press conference
Credits another outlet 0 of 6
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 6
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 27, 19:04 UTC by NewsNation, naming its source. First document in the first report, from NewsNation (DNA evidence).
Not counted 0
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Right-leaning coverage omits the victim-to-victim lab step, so the breakthrough reads as a simple Bundy-to-Smith DNA hit rather than a chain through another 1974 victim. A Y-STR profile from Laura Aime's body was a genetic match to one from Smith's, the Guardian reports, after Aime had already been tied to Bundy. Once that neighboring case closed, the Washington Examiner says, counties matched Bundy's DNA to the Smith murder, with no intervening match between the victims' profiles. Left-leaning coverage in the BBC says the body showed "signs of rape and torture." Right-leaning coverage names the offense only as murder, with no description of the scene. Did Bundy ever confess to killing Melissa Smith before his execution, or does the identification rest on DNA alone?
Bottom line

The Washington Examiner said counties matched Bundy's DNA to Melissa Smith. It never said, as the Guardian did, that the new evidence was a Y-STR match to another 1974 victim.

The receipts — 4 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • A Y-STR DNA profile from Laura Aime's body was a genetic match to one found from Melissa Smith's body official statementin The Guardian · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Summit County and Salt Lake County investigators led the Smith case from the start and later partnered with Utah County contextin Washington Examiner · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Melissa Ann Smith was the daughter of a local police chief individual casein BBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Salt Lake County Sheriff Rosie Rivera said the case shows the need to preserve evidence even when decades pass official statementin BBC, The Guardian · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
Left-leaning outlets frame the announcement as delayed justice made possible by forensic progress and evidence preservation, quoting Salt Lake County Sheriff Rosie Rivera that the case “demonstrates the need to preserve evidence even when decades pass” and should signal to other cold-case families “that there is hope out there.” BBC and The Guardian recap Bundy’s public lures, 1970s killing spree, and prison escapes, and they give prominence to Utah County Sgt. Mike Reynolds’s call to “stomp the memory of Ted Bundy out,” with The Guardian adding his remark that the victims’ voices “ring louder than the hate and sedition of the one that took their lives.” BBC also reports Reynolds saying more Bundy cases are still being examined in Utah and cites 444 unsolved death investigations in the state, including 258 homicides.
The Right View
The Washington Examiner treats the news as a closed investigation rather than a forensic-justice parable, emphasizing that Summit County and Salt Lake County investigators, who had long handled Smith’s case, partnered with Utah County after that office used new DNA profiling to close Aime’s murder and then matched Bundy’s DNA to Smith. The account is short and procedural, omitting Bundy’s biography, remaining unsolved-case counts, and the victim-memory quotations that structure left-leaning coverage.
Our Take (balanced)
Left-leaning coverage’s strongest argument is that preserved crime-scene material and newer DNA methods can still identify a killer decades later and keep hope alive in other cold cases, evidenced by the Aime–Smith Y-STR match and Rivera’s preservation remarks. Right-leaning coverage’s strongest argument is that the result was an inter-county investigative product after Utah County’s Aime breakthrough, evidenced by the Examiner’s account of Summit, Salt Lake, and Utah counties coordinating to close the file. The central unresolved tension is not factual — both sides accept the DNA attribution — but over whether the story is primarily about forensic science and centering victims over Bundy’s infamy, or about law-enforcement agencies completing a 52-year case.

6 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.