Pepsi Renews Taco Bell Contract Through 2036
Left 50%
Center 0%
Right 50%
1 left · 0 center · 1 right
What happened
On Thursday, PepsiCo announced it had renewed its partnership with Taco Bell through 2036, covering Taco Bell, Taco Bell Cantina and Live Más Café locations in the United States and Taco Bell restaurants in international markets including Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland and Thailand. The announcement came about one week after KFC — another Yum Brands chain, which PepsiCo had owned before spinning the restaurants into a separate public company in 1997 — said it would switch from Pepsi to Coca-Cola at its U.S. restaurants, ending a roughly four-decade beverage relationship, with the transition set to begin in January 2027 across about 3,700 locations. The Taco Bell–PepsiCo partnership has produced exclusive menu items including Mountain Dew Baja Blast and Doritos Locos Tacos.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 2 articles
2 of 2 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 2 of 2
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Catherine Tan-Gillespie, PepsiCo, Anne Fink and Meg Farren
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 2 of 2
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: company statement
- Credits another outlet 0 of 2
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
- Unnamed sources 0 of 2
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 22, 15:52 UTC by CNBC, naming its source. First document in the first report, from CNBC (company statement).
- Not counted 0
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
The Taco Bell-Pepsi deal is a supplier renewal on one side and the leftover of a corporate breakup on the other. Right-leaning coverage never mentions that PepsiCo once owned Taco Bell. Left-leaning coverage dates the partnership to the 1997 spinoff of the restaurants, which is how a reader learns the fountain contract began as parent-company control rather than a vendor bake-off. Without that history, the Fox Business account is about co-created menu items. With it, the CNBC account is a relationship that outlived a breakup and now runs on separate terms at Taco Bell and KFC.
Left-leaning coverage leads with KFC's move to Coke and treats the Taco Bell news as a follow-on in that fight. Right-leaning coverage leads with Baja Blast remaining on the menu and treats the KFC switch as a neighboring item.
What did PepsiCo pay, or concede on exclusivity, to keep Taco Bell through 2036 while KFC walked away?
Bottom line
Fox Business can tell you Baja Blast stays, but not that Pepsi used to own Taco Bell. CNBC is the outlet that still ties the drinks contract to the restaurant spinoff.
The receipts — 2 facts one side's coverage lacks
- Mountain Dew Baja Blast has grown into a billion-dollar brand
- The partnership covers Taco Bell, Taco Bell Cantina and Live Más Café locations nationwide
The Left View
CNBC framed the renewal as arriving in the shadow of the KFC switch, calling Coca-Cola's U.S. win "more symbolic" and "another example of how the Atlanta-based company has been beating its rival in the soda category." It said it is unusual but not unprecedented for large restaurant chains to change drink providers as Coke and Pepsi compete through "perks and other inducements," and cited an Oct. 15 memo from KFC's U.S. president stating that Pepsi remains an important partner for Yum Brands and KFC's international markets despite the U.S. "defection."
The Right View
Fox Business led with the product stakes of the 11-year extension, emphasizing that Mountain Dew Baja Blast — described as a "fan-favorite" created through the partnership that "has grown into a billion-dollar brand" — will remain on the menu alongside Pepsi, Pepsi Zero Sugar, Mountain Dew, Starry and Baja Midnight. It quoted PepsiCo Global Away from Home President Anne Fink on co-created products and Taco Bell President Meg Farren calling PepsiCo a "trusted partner" looking to "drive long-term growth," and noted that Doritos Locos Tacos will mark its 15th anniversary in 2027 with additional flavors planned.
Our Take (balanced)
CNBC's strongest argument is that the renewal should be read inside a soda-category contest in which Coca-Cola has been gaining ground, with the KFC U.S. switch as a "symbolic" win even as Pepsi retained Taco Bell; the timing — one week after KFC's announcement — and the decades-long Yum relationship are the main supporting facts. Fox Business's strongest argument is that the deal extends a distinctive co-innovation partnership whose signature products, especially Baja Blast as a "billion-dollar brand," justified an 11-year continuation on their own; executive statements about co-creation and planned new Doritos Locos Tacos flavors are the main supporting evidence. The central unresolved tension is whether this is primarily a competitive-account story — Pepsi locking down a remaining Yum chain after losing KFC in the United States — or a product-partnership story in which both companies simply chose to keep a commercially successful collaboration going.
2 sources
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.