OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Troy Jackson Defeats Susan Collins in Maine Senate Race

22 sources · updated 2026-11-04
Left 59% Center 9% Right 32%
13 left · 2 center · 7 right

What happened

Democrat Troy Jackson defeated five-term Republican Sen. Susan Collins in Maine’s U.S. Senate election on November 3, 2026, ending Collins’s tenure that began in 1997. Collins, who chaired the Senate Appropriations Committee, conceded shortly after midnight on November 4; with roughly two-thirds of ballots counted, Jackson led about 53 percent to 47 percent. Jackson, a former logger from Allagash and former president of the Maine State Senate, became the Democratic nominee in late July after original nominee Graham Platner withdrew following sexual assault allegations, which Platner denied. The Maine result was one of several Democratic Senate pickups as the party won control of both chambers of Congress in the 2026 midterms.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 22 articles

10 of 17 articles cite a named source for the story. It started with unnamed sources; a named source appeared the next day.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 10 of 17
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Troy Jackson, Susan Collins, Charlie Dingman, NBC News, Josh Turek and Mary Peltola
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 17
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
Credits another outlet 0 of 17
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 1 of 17
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this. Here: e.g. “people say”
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 31, 22:45 UTC by New York Times, with no named source. First named source the next day, from Fox News.
Not counted 5
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Right-leaning coverage never reports the vote-alignment rate that left-leaning coverage treats as the collapse of Collins's moderate brand, the reputation that had kept her seated in a state that votes Democratic for president. The Intercept cited a Congressional Quarterly finding that she aligned with Trump 90 percent of the time in both of his terms. Fox News instead dwelt on her breaks with the White House and aired her claim she was no "puppet of the president." Left-leaning coverage and right-leaning coverage split on the word for the man who unseated Collins after a truncated campaign. The Intercept called him a "progressive challenger." Breitbart called him a "Far-left Democrat." Those labels set different distances from the Democratic mainstream for the same biography of a former logger and state senate president. None of the coverage measures how many of Collins's 2020 supporters actually switched sides.
Bottom line

The Intercept printed a 90 percent Trump score for Collins that Fox News never ran, so one side's independent dealmaker is the other side's near-party-line vote.

The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Congressional Quarterly Roll Call found Collins's votes aligned with Trump 90 percent of the time in both of his terms numberin The Intercept · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Jackson's longtime partner and mother of his two children is his second cousin; they share great-grandparents contextin Fox News, Breitbart · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Nearly $200 million was spent on ads in the Maine Senate race, the most expensive per capita in the cycle numberin New York Post · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • A super PAC aligned with Senate Democrats spent 70 percent of its TV, streaming, and digital money in Maine on abortion-related ads numberin Vox · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Jackson has said ICE should be disbanded altogether official statementin Mother Jones, NBC News · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
Left-leaning outlets framed Collins’s loss as the collapse of a moderate brand that no longer matched her votes, citing a Congressional Quarterly Roll Call analysis that she aligned with President Donald Trump 90 percent of the time and Jackson’s debate claim that she voted with him 96 percent of the time. They argued two issues were decisive: abortion, because this was the first time she faced voters since Roe v. Wade was overturned and she had cast a pivotal vote to confirm Justice Brett Kavanaugh — a vote Vox reported she doubled down on — and healthcare costs, after she helped advance a Republican package that gutted Medicaid even though she opposed final passage. The Intercept and Mother Jones portrayed Jackson as a working-class progressive who ran on lowering costs, expanding health care, and curbing corporate PACs, and they tied the outcome to Maine disapproval of Trump and a broader Democratic overperformance. Maine Democratic Party Chair Charlie Dingman told The Intercept that Collins had not used her seniority “to aggressively stand in the way of that destructive presidency.”
The Right View
Right-leaning outlets described the result as the end of a durable moderate’s era and, in Fox News and the New York Post, a “major upset” or “stunner,” while stressing Jackson’s late, chaotic path onto the ballot after Platner’s withdrawal amid a Nazi-linked tattoo, resurfaced comments, and sexual assault allegations. They cast Jackson as far-left — aligned with Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, backing Medicare for All and abolishing ICE — and as an Augusta career politician whose logger pitch sat atop two decades in the legislature; Fox News also noted reports that his longtime partner is his second cousin. Collins was framed as an independent who steered federal dollars to Maine as Appropriations chair, broke with Trump on impeachment, Canadian tariffs, and the final tax-and-spending bill, and was the last congressional Republican from New England. The Daily Wire treated the race as a referendum Democrats turned against Trump and the national GOP, delivering a pickup toward Senate control.
Our Take (balanced)
The left’s strongest argument is that Collins’s independent reputation was no longer credible: the CQ finding of 90 percent alignment with Trump, her Kavanaugh vote in the first post-Roe election, and her role advancing a Medicaid-cutting bill gave Democrats a record that cost-of-living polling (Jackson trusted 51–44 on that issue in the final Times/Siena survey) could exploit in a state Trump never won. The right’s strongest argument is that Collins had repeatedly survived Democratic Maine as a fund-delivering moderate — winning by nine points in 2020 even as Trump lost the state by nine — and that replacing her with a Sanders-aligned nominee who favors Medicare for All and abolishing ICE is a sharp ideological break after a disintegrating primary, not a verdict on her constituent service. The central unresolved tension is whether she lost because her moderate brand had become a mismatch with her votes, or because a national anti-Trump midterm wave overcame an incumbent whose seniority had previously insulated her from the same headwinds.

22 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.