Severe Weather Disrupts Election Day Voting
Left 40%
Center 0%
Right 60%
2 left · 0 center · 3 right
What happened
A powerful storm system brought heavy rain, flash flooding, tornadoes, and high winds to parts of the United States around Election Day, affecting voting logistics in several states. In Florida, a storm that dumped as much as 22 inches of rain in 24 hours caused flash floods that led officials to relocate polling sites in multiple Atlantic-coast counties, and Gov. Ron DeSantis declared a state of emergency in seven counties. A tornado with peak winds of about 100 mph damaged the Keyes Community Center polling site in Cimarron County, Oklahoma; flooding in the Four Corners region prompted Utah Lt. Gov. Deidre M. Henderson to declare a state of emergency and allow isolated San Juan County voters to request and return ballots electronically, with Colorado authorizing similar measures in La Plata and Archuleta counties; two of 254 Maricopa County, Arizona, voting centers closed briefly due to power issues before reopening. Rain, strong winds, and possible flash flooding were forecast for the central U.S., Midwest, and Mid-South on Election Day, and a man was found dead in Flagstaff, Arizona, after being swept into floodwaters.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 5 articles
4 of 5 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 4 of 5
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Evan Bentley, Jennifer Tate, National Weather Service, Deidre M. Henderson, Florida Department of State and Ron DeSantis
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 1 of 5
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: executive order
- Credits another outlet 0 of 5
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
- Unnamed sources 0 of 5
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Nov 2, 18:06 UTC by NBC News, naming its source. First document 18 hours later, from Fox News (executive order).
- Not counted 0
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
Left-leaning coverage tells readers the storms are unlikely to change results; right-leaning coverage does not. Rain's effect on turnout has weakened as early and mail voting spread, researchers told NBC News. That same report puts the share of Americans who still vote on Election Day at about 37 percent. The Washington Examiner instead says poor weather is known to suppress turnout "especially among low-propensity voters," with no mention of early voting.
Right-leaning coverage leads with the storm's human toll and reach; left-leaning coverage leads with polling places on the move. A man found dead in Flagstaff floodwaters opens the New York Post account. That piece forecasts a system reaching 120 million people by week's end. Flash flooding that forced officials to relocate polling sites in hot-button races opens the NBC News account.
How many voters were actually unable to cast a ballot because of the weather?
Bottom line
You could read the Washington Examiner on these storms and never learn NBC News' figure that only about 37 percent of Americans still vote on Election Day.
The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
- Only about 37% of Americans still vote on Election Day, per the U.S. Election Assistance Commission
- In presidential elections from 1948 to 2000, turnout fell about 0.8 percentage points for each inch of rain above a county's average
- Two Maricopa County voting centers were temporarily closed due to power-related issues
- A tornado forced Cimarron County, Oklahoma, to move a polling place after damaging the Keyes Community Center
- Utah's lieutenant governor allowed isolated San Juan County voters to request and return ballots electronically
The Left View
NBC News sources framed the storms as a factor that campaigns would watch in tight Texas and Kansas Senate races but whose effect on the electoral outcome was expected to be minimal. They cited Brad Gomez’s analysis of 1948–2000 elections finding that every extra inch of rain above a county’s average reduced turnout by about eight-tenths of a percentage point, and Thomas Fujiwara’s finding that the effect “was stronger in the ’50s and ’60s, and it’s weaker now,” so “we shouldn’t think of rain being a major driver.” Both researchers noted that early and mail voting mean only about 37 percent of Americans now vote on Election Day (with state shares ranging from about 20 percent in Texas to 60 percent in Minnesota), making partisan effects hard to predict. Coverage also recorded that the two brief Arizona closures “sparked a chorus of conspiracy insinuations online.”
The Right View
Right-leaning sources framed the weather as set to complicate voting in states holding pivotal races. The Washington Examiner stated that poor weather is known to suppress turnout, especially among low-propensity voters, and highlighted Florida’s polling-location changes as a disruption to voting logistics. The New York Post described a “powerful cross-country storm” that turned deadly, threatened flash flooding across the Mid-South and Midwest on Election Day, and was expected to have impacted more than 35 states and 120 million people, while noting polling-site changes and emergency accommodations in the Southwest.
Our Take (balanced)
Left-leaning coverage’s strongest argument is that weather’s turnout effect has become modest and is “weaker now,” supported by multi-decade academic analyses showing roughly 0.8-point drops per extra rain inch and by current data that only about 37 percent of Americans vote in person on Election Day. Right-leaning coverage’s strongest argument is that the storms produced concrete logistical interruptions—relocated sites, a damaged facility, and emergency electronic-voting accommodations—in states with pivotal races, consistent with weather’s known suppression of low-propensity voters. The central unresolved tension is whether those on-the-ground interruptions plus the day’s forecast conditions will produce a politically consequential turnout shift or remain inside the historically limited range that alternative voting methods have further reduced.
5 sources
- Storms expected to hit parts of Texas and Kansas on Election Day
- Floods and severe weather beset parts of the U.S. on Election Day
- Florida polling places in 7 counties are moving locations due to flooding
- Where weather could complicate Election Day voting
- Storm turns deadly as system threatens flash flooding on Election Day in Central US
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.