OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Russia Shuts Down Last Independent Newspaper Novaya Gazeta

3 sources · updated 2026-10-31
Left 67% Center 0% Right 33%
2 left · 0 center · 1 right

What happened

Novaya Gazeta, a Russian newspaper founded in 1993 with help from former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, who used money from his Nobel Peace Prize to help establish it, announced it is shutting down after more than three decades. Editor-in-Chief Sergei Sokolov said the closure was due to pressure from authorities and opened his statement with “We were killed.” The paper was formerly led by Nobel Peace Prize laureate Dmitry Muratov. Journalists at the outlet said the government had orchestrated its demise, saying “They killed us.”
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 3 articles

2 of 3 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 2 of 3
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Novaya Gazeta and Sergei Sokolov
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 3
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
Credits another outlet 0 of 3
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 3
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 30, 09:59 UTC by Bloomberg, naming its source.
Not counted 0
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Right-leaning coverage presents the shutdown as the end of independent newspapers in Russia, a scale left-leaning coverage never claims. The Washington Examiner calls Novaya Gazeta the "last independent newspaper." Left-leaning coverage describes a prominent independent outlet without saying whether any others remain, so those readers cannot tell if this was a final blow or one more silenced title among many. Left-leaning coverage wraps the story around Dmitry Muratov, the Nobel laureate who formerly led the paper. Right-leaning coverage instead names Editor-in-Chief Sergei Sokolov as the person who announced the closure and credits Mikhail Gorbachev with helping found it. The two portraits of the same institution barely overlap. What specific court order, license revocation, or agency action actually forced the paper to close?
Bottom line

Skip the Washington Examiner and you never hear Novaya Gazeta called the "last independent newspaper," so the shutdown can look like the loss of one famous title rather than the last paper of its kind.

The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Described as Russia's last independent newspaper contextin Washington Examiner · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • The paper blamed persecution by the Kremlin and security services official statementin Bloomberg · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Journalists said the government had orchestrated its demise official statementin The New York Times · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Founded in 1993 numberin Washington Examiner · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Had frequently weathered censorship and harassment contextin Washington Examiner · absent from left-leaning coverage
The Left View
Left-leaning coverage frames the closure as targeted political persecution rather than a routine shutdown. Bloomberg reports that the paper blamed “persecution by the Kremlin and security services.” The New York Times, calling the outlet “fiercely independent,” says journalists stated that the government had “orchestrated its demise,” quoting “They killed us,” and foregrounds the Nobel stature of its leadership as evidence of the paper’s international standing.
The Right View
The Washington Examiner frames the event as the extinguishing of independent Russian print media, calling Novaya Gazeta “Russia’s last independent newspaper and one of its most well-known.” It stresses a three-decade record of the paper being “constantly at odds with authorities and frequently weathering censorship and harassment,” and highlights Sokolov’s opening line, “We were killed.” Its headline assigns agency to the Russian state (“Russia shuts down”), even as the article reports that the newspaper itself announced the closure.
Our Take (balanced)
The left’s strongest argument is that this was persecution with a named perpetrator: Bloomberg’s attribution to “the Kremlin and security services,” and the Times’s report that journalists said the government “orchestrated its demise,” are the clearest claims of state intent. The right’s strongest argument is that an already exceptional independent outlet has now been ended after decades of censorship and harassment, crystallized in the Examiner’s “last independent newspaper” label and Sokolov’s “We were killed.” The central unresolved tension is agency and completeness — whether the paper closed itself under duress, as its own announcement describes, or the Russian state shut it down, as the Examiner headline and the Times’s “orchestrated” language imply — and whether Novaya Gazeta was in fact Russia’s last independent newspaper.

3 sources

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.