OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Rubio Urges Cuban Dissidents to Partner With CIA

9 sources · updated 2026-10-24
Left 22% Center 11% Right 67%
2 left · 1 center · 6 right

What happened

On Friday, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio posted on X that Cubans seeking “positive change” should act because “now is the time,” and that they should “seize this opportunity to create the change you desire through a discrete partnership with the CIA.” The CIA reposted the message and published a Spanish-language video showing how to contact the agency. The same day, at a campaign rally in Fort Myers, Florida, President Donald Trump said Navy ships returning from waters near Iran could stop about 50 yards off Cuba’s coast, after which he would “send Marco Rubio in to finish up the deal.” Cuban Deputy Foreign Minister Carlos Fernández de Cossío wrote that the United States was “resorting to public recruitment for the CIA,” and Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla said Cuba rejected “any threats stemming from U.S. ambitions toward Cuba.”
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 9 articles

8 of 8 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 8 of 8
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Marco Rubio, Carlos Fernandez de Cossio, Donald Trump, Carlos Fernández de Cossío and Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 8
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
Credits another outlet 0 of 8
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 8
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 23, 23:43 UTC by Fox News, naming its source.
Not counted 1
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Left-leaning coverage never reports that the CIA itself posted a how-to video after Rubio asked Cubans for a partnership, so the episode reads as a diplomat's tweet rather than an open agency recruitment drive. Daily Caller described a Spanish-language clip that coached would-be informants to use a private browser. The Guardian carried Havana's accusation of public CIA recruitment and did not mention the video. The Friday ship remarks did not land as the same act. Breitbart wrote that a warship could "force Cuba's communist government to surrender," while left-leaning coverage said those ships could intervene on the way back from Iran. None of the coverage says what a Cuban who contacts the CIA would be asked to do.
Bottom line

The Guardian covers Rubio's CIA appeal without the agency's how-to video, so a left-leaning reader never sees Daily Caller's report that recruits were told to use a throwaway email.

The receipts — 3 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • The CIA released a Spanish-language video that coached would-be informants to use a private browser and a throwaway email when reaching out online official statementin Daily Caller · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Trump told reporters he anticipated the two countries will make a deal and said he did not think the military would be needed official statementin The Guardian · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Rubio negotiated earlier this year with a grandson of Raúl Castro contextin Daily Caller · absent from left-leaning coverage
The Left View
Left-leaning coverage treated Rubio’s post as an unusual public CIA recruitment drive, issued moments after Trump’s naval remarks, which The Guardian described as a suggestion that U.S. warships “could intervene in Cuba on their way back from the Iran war.” The Guardian highlighted Havana’s mockery of American “desperation,” including Fernández de Cossío’s line that the agency was being forced “to sell its services like a tube of toothpaste,” and noted that Rubio appeared to use “discrete” when he likely meant “discreet.” It situated the episode in a pattern of Trump and Rubio raising the specter of intervention—including Trump’s earlier claim that “it looks like I’ll be the one that does it”—then imposing more sanctions after talks with Cuban officials left Washington unimpressed. Coverage also tied the timing to Florida midterm politics, the effect of the Iran war on consumer prices, and Cuba’s post-2020 crisis of blackouts, shortages, and emigration under the decades-long U.S. embargo.
The Right View
Right-leaning outlets framed Rubio’s appeal as a direct call for Cuban dissidents to work with U.S. intelligence against a failing communist government. Fox News noted that Rubio, the son of Cuban immigrants, has long opposed normalizing relations without political reforms, and that the post did not identify a specific operation. Breitbart characterized Trump’s rally comments as plans that “a U.S. warship could force Cuba’s communist government to surrender,” and stressed Cuba as a national-security issue and a Florida voting-bloc concern. The Daily Caller described the message as openly urging dissidents to pursue a CIA partnership to “force change on the communist-run island,” and reported that the CIA followed with a Spanish-language video coaching would-be informants on how to make contact.
Our Take (balanced)
The left’s strongest argument is that pairing an explicit, public CIA recruitment pitch with talk of warships stopping 50 yards offshore is an unusually overt regime-change signal, a reading backed by the CIA’s how-to video and by Cuban officials’ on-record claim that Washington was “resorting to public recruitment for the CIA” out of “desperation.” The right’s strongest argument is that Rubio was offering a channel to Cubans already living under what he called “failed promises, corruption, and the privileged lives of only a few” in a communist system he has described as lacking a functional economy, a view aligned with the island’s documented shortages, blackouts, and emigration and with the administration’s portrayal of Havana as a security threat. The central unresolved tension is whether the episode is support for political change inside a hostile, collapsing dictatorship or public U.S. interference that mixes intelligence recruitment with implied military coercion.

9 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.