OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Pat McAfee Blasts University of Utah Over Instagram Video

5 sources · updated 2026-10-28
Left 20% Center 0% Right 80%
1 left · 0 center · 4 right

What happened

On Saturday, ESPN College GameDay host Pat McAfee broadcast from the University of Utah in Salt Lake City after university-linked Instagram accounts posted a now-deleted video of students doing impressions of him, including calling him "corny" and "creepy." On Monday’s Pat McAfee Show he said the same remarks on students’ own platforms would have been "all good," but that the university posting them as he was about to "do an infomercial for the place" and walk in front of thousands created an "uncomfortable feeling" he had "never experienced," that he was "very, very uncomfortable," and that he hoped never to return. He asked whether "something else happen pretty scary at a college gathering in the state of Utah recently" and whether a university should be "amplifying reasons why people hate my guts," remarks coverage identified as referring to the killing of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in Orem, about 40 miles south of Salt Lake City. The university said it "missed the mark," took "full accountability," apologized for any perception McAfee was "unsafe or unwelcome," and said he and the GameDay crew are always welcome; ESPN said team safety is "paramount," that members face "very real threats," and that it supports McAfee and recognizes his concerns as "very real and valid." During the show he also picked Houston over Utah ("I’ll never see you again, hopefully") and said "I hate this place" after a student in a field-goal contest questioned a $1 million prize versus $3 million the prior week.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 5 articles

5 of 5 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 5 of 5
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Pat McAfee, ESPN, University of Utah and ESPN spokesperson
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 5
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
Credits another outlet 0 of 5
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 5
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 27, 00:03 UTC by New York Post, naming its source.
Not counted 0
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Right-leaning coverage is more complete on McAfee's break with Utah, including that he will "never go to that place." Left-leaning coverage leaves that vow out, so a reader sees a deleted video and a university apology rather than a split with the campus. Without that vow, the school's statement that he is always welcome looks like the end of the matter. His discomfort over the official account posting the clip appears in NBC News, which then turns to the apology and to his polarizing reputation. Left-leaning coverage opens on the university saying sorry. The Fox News lede is McAfee invoking the Charlie Kirk killing. Did McAfee or the GameDay crew receive any threat in Salt Lake City, or only the insults on the school's Instagram?
Bottom line

Read NBC News and the McAfee-Utah fight ends with an apology and a welcome-back note. The New York Post is where he says he is done with the campus.

The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • McAfee said he will never go to that place and hopes never to return contextin New York Post, Fox News · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • ESPN said it supports McAfee and recognizes his safety and security concerns as real and valid official statementin New York Post · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • The university said it aimed at lighthearted engagement, missed the mark, and took full accountability for staff posting the video official statementin New York Post, Fox News · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • McAfee said he hated the place after a kicking-contest student compared a $1 million prize to $3 million the week before individual casein New York Post, Fox News · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • During the broadcast McAfee told the Utah student section he would never see them again, hopefully contextin New York Post · absent from left-leaning coverage
The Left View
NBC News framed the episode as a university apology after a "handful of students" made "moderately disparaging remarks," and it stressed McAfee’s own line that personal-blog criticism would have been acceptable. It situated him as "among the most polarizing figures in modern sports media" and noted he previously "was forced to apologize" to a University of Mississippi student after amplifying a false rumor that she was having an affair with her boyfriend’s father. It said he "appeared to draw a comparison between himself and right-wing provocateur Charlie Kirk."
The Right View
The New York Post and Fox News framed McAfee as issuing a scathing rebuke and vowing not to return after an "uncomfortable" visit, and they treated the university statement as damage control. They foregrounded the Kirk comments as invoking a killing at a nearby Utah campus and highlighted ESPN’s language that his safety concerns are "very real and valid." They also treated the kicking-contest prize complaint and his on-air hope never to see the crowd again as further evidence the stop went badly. Fox News tied the safety remarks to a broader campus climate, including a survey that 30 percent of college students say violence is an acceptable way to stop speakers.
Our Take (balanced)
The left’s strongest argument is that the remarks were mild teasing the school meant as "lighthearted engagement," that McAfee is a polarizing entertainer who routinely takes "shots," and that analogizing "corny" and "creepy" to Kirk’s killing is a strained self-comparison—supported by NBC’s "moderately disparaging" characterization and by his prior forced apology over a false rumor. The right’s strongest argument is that the publisher, not the wording, is the issue: an official university account posting mockery of a guest just before he faces a large crowd is not equivalent to student blogs, and treating that as a safety problem is backed by ESPN’s on-record claim that threats to the team are "very real" and by Kirk’s killing at a nearby Utah campus event. The central unresolved tension is whether that official post was a clumsy joke a public figure should brush off or an institutional act that can reasonably be read as hostility with security implications.

5 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.