Midterms Could Impact Stocks AI Defense Crypto
Left 67%
Center 33%
Right 0%
2 left · 1 center · 0 right
What happened
Market and policy analysts have been assessing how the coming U.S. midterm elections could affect publicly traded companies that depend on federal spending, regulation, or both. A Morgan Stanley analysis published Thursday found that, under Republican presidents, the S&P 500 has historically gained an average of 23% in the year after midterms when Congress was split, versus 16% when Democrats controlled both chambers. In September, the Senate failed to advance the Clarity Act, a cryptocurrency market-structure bill, and shares of Coinbase and Circle fell as much as 11%; the same month the House voted 417-3 to require state regulators to consider making large data centers cover added electricity-infrastructure costs, a measure that then stalled in the Senate 57-43. Lockheed Martin derives about 70% of sales from the U.S. government, and Molina Healthcare reported that Medicaid accounted for $32.2 billion, or 75%, of its 2025 premium revenue. On Oct. 21, Sen. Richard Blumenthal sought records tied to a White House ballroom project from corporate donors, and Rep. Jamie Raskin has sought records on tariff exclusions.
ONE-SIDED THIS WEEK.
Only left-leaning outlets have covered this story in the last two days;
New York Post reported it on 2026-10-19.
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
Right-leaning outlets had not covered this as of publication. Left-leaning coverage reports that midterm control of Congress could shift leverage over defense contractors, Medicaid insurers, crypto firms, and AI builders whose business models run through Washington. A reader of the silent side therefore misses the claim that Democratic gavels would bring subpoena power and that budget talks could slow Medicaid cuts, plus CNBC's caveat that the president would keep his veto.
Left-leaning coverage splits on what to put first. Bloomberg leads with AI as a midterm campaign fight over regulation and safety. CNBC instead opens with government-dependent companies and only later calls AI "the messiest political trade of all," after defense, healthcare, and crypto.
If a Democratic chamber cannot repeal the spending law on its own, which of the named stock risks would actually take effect?
Bottom line
Right-leaning outlets have not reported CNBC's midterm-stocks map, including that Molina Healthcare gets 75 percent of its premiums from Medicaid.
The receipts — 6 facts one side's coverage lacks
- Democratic control of either the House or Senate would grant committee gavels and subpoena power
- Molina Healthcare generated 75% of its 2025 premium revenue from Medicaid
- Lockheed Martin gets about 70% of its sales from the U.S. government
- The 2025 spending law is projected to reduce federal Medicaid spending by $911 billion through 2034
- The White House has requested $1.5 trillion for national defense in fiscal 2027
- Shares of Coinbase and Circle fell as much as 11% when the Senate failed to advance the Clarity Act
The Left View
Bloomberg reported that AI has moved to the center of midterm campaigns, with candidates clashing over regulation, data centers, jobs, and safety, and that Democratic control of Congress could produce a more aggressive regulatory approach. CNBC framed Washington as part of the business model for defense, healthcare, banking, crypto, and AI firms, arguing a Democratic win in either chamber would bring committee gavels, subpoena power, and leverage over spending, while President Trump would retain the veto and authority over tariffs, immigration, and regulation. CNBC cited KFF/CBO figures projecting $911 billion in Medicaid spending reductions through 2034 under the 2025 tax-and-spending law, a White House request of $1.5 trillion for national defense in fiscal 2027 plus an $87.6 billion Iran-related supplemental, Lockheed’s still-unfunded framework for 850 F-35s, and voter opposition to nearby data centers (63% in a CNBC survey). Named strategists at Morgan Stanley, LPL, and CFRA said some policy shifts could be market-moving for specific sectors even if historical midterm rallies do not fully repeat. NewsNation, by contrast, reported that stocks often rally after midterms but that a strategist said Wall Street is more focused on AI investment and future rate hikes than on the election itself.
Our Take (balanced)
This is substantive as a documented map of company-to-Washington exposure, not as proof that any election outcome has already moved markets. Established, checkable items include SEC-filed revenue mixes, the September Clarity Act failure and associated share drops, the 417-3 House vote and 57-43 Senate stall on data-center power costs, the reported Blumenthal and Raskin document requests, and the historical S&P averages as published by Morgan Stanley. What remains forward-looking—not established—is that Democrats would win a chamber, that they would then investigate particular firms or families, that Medicaid or defense dollars would actually change, or that those changes would reprice stocks in the ways analysts sketch. No right-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch the midterm results, any successor crypto market-structure bill, congressional action on Medicaid and the F-35 multiyear buy, Senate movement on data-center grid costs, and whether document requests become subpoenas if chamber control changes.
3 sources
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.