Kalshi valuation jumps to $40 billion in funding round
Left 50%
Center 0%
Right 50%
1 left · 0 center · 1 right
What happened
Kalshi, a New York-based prediction-market exchange led by CEO Tarek Mansour and executive Luana Lopes Lara, announced on Thursday a $1 billion funding round co-led by Sequoia Capital and Wellington Management that values the company at $40 billion, up from $22 billion in May and from $5 billion in October 2025, bringing total capital raised to roughly $3.6 billion. The company said growth since May was driven by trading on the 2026 FIFA World Cup, NFL games (including combo contracts similar to parlays), and election markets ahead of the U.S. midterms, and that it would use the funds to develop leveraged event contracts, perpetual futures tied to individual stocks, and markets on the price of compute, as well as to expand an institutional business that in September included 500 entities. Two U.S. appeals courts, in August and then September, ruled that states have the power to regulate sports-related event contracts, while a third appeals court has ruled that federal oversight applies; Kalshi argues its event contracts are financial swaps under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission rather than gambling. This week Utah’s attorney general brought criminal charges against Kalshi, Mansour, and Lopes Lara alleging the platform illegally promotes online betting in a state that has outlawed gambling, a day after the CFTC sued to block Utah from enforcing those laws against the firm; Native American tribes have also sued over sports betting on reservations, and last month the Ninth Circuit ruled against Kalshi in one such case.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 2 articles
2 of 2 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 2 of 2
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Kalshi
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 2
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
- Credits another outlet 0 of 2
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
- Unnamed sources 0 of 2
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 29, 12:05 UTC by CNBC, naming its source.
- Not counted 0
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
Left-leaning coverage omits that Kalshi and its founders now face criminal charges, so the raise reads as a growth story with a jurisdiction dispute attached. Right-leaning coverage reports that Utah's attorney general charged the company, Tarek Mansour, and Luana Lopes Lara with illegally promoting betting in a state that has outlawed gambling. Left-leaning coverage instead describes "legal headwinds" and appeals-court rulings on who regulates sports event contracts. A reader of CNBC would not know a criminal case against the CEO sat beside the $40 billion valuation.
Left-leaning coverage calls Kalshi a "prediction market exchange." Right-leaning coverage describes the same products as "wagers." That word choice recasts a financial platform as a betting shop.
How much of the new valuation depends on sports contracts remaining outside state gambling law?
Bottom line
CNBC put Kalshi at $40 billion and treated the legal fight as something the Supreme Court will sort out. That version never mentions Utah's criminal charges against the CEO.
The receipts — 3 facts one side's coverage lacks
- Sports betting accounted for as much as 70% of an estimated $4 billion in revenue during the 12 months ended July
- A third U.S. appeals court has ruled that the federal government has authority over sports-related event contracts
- The Ninth Circuit ruled against Kalshi in a Native American tribe lawsuit over sports betting on reservations
The Left View
CNBC frames the round as a growth-and-expansion story in which prediction markets are “just the start” as Kalshi seeks to “build a broader financial exchange,” after a late-May launch of perpetual futures described as the first such U.S. exchange offering, plus plans for leveraged event contracts, stock-tied perpetual futures, and compute-price markets. It attributes “explosive growth of combo contracts” to the World Cup and NFL season and notes increased midterm-election trading, while treating the sports-contract court split as “legal headwinds” that a Supreme Court case will “likely solve.” The piece highlights institutional traction—those 500 entities, and 25% of volume excluding market makers—and Mansour’s June remark on CNBC that a company of Kalshi’s “financial profile with the rate of growth that we’re seeing” would have to consider public markets, though not until 2027. CNBC discloses a commercial relationship with Kalshi that includes customer acquisition and a minority investment.
The Right View
The New York Post frames the same round against “mounting legal and regulatory hurdles that threaten to upend the fast-growing company,” and reports that sports betting accounts for “as much as 70% of an estimated $4 billion in revenue” in the 12 months ended July, according to a source close to the company. It leads with Mansour and Lopes Lara confirming they “used to date”—Lara called it “a long time ago”; Mansour said “the company always comes first” and that the relationship had “fizzled out” before they started the firm—a rumor Polymarket CEO Shayne Coplan had “repeatedly circulated.” The Post emphasizes Utah Attorney General Derek Brown’s allegation that Kalshi is “the manager of a back-alley gambling den” with a “brazen pattern of unlawful conduct,” other states’ efforts to block wagers, the tribal suits, and the Ninth Circuit ruling “setting the stage for a showdown in the Supreme Court that risks crippling the app’s exploding business.” It notes Donald Trump Jr. joined as a strategic advisor last year and is an equity holder, and that Kalshi has received “a light regulatory touch from the Trump administration’s CFTC.”
Our Take (balanced)
CNBC’s strongest argument is that successive private-market valuations and already-launched expansion—perpetual futures in the U.S., plus institutional counterparties already a quarter of non-market-maker volume—show investors treating Kalshi as a scaling financial exchange rather than a single-product betting app. The Post’s strongest argument is that sports contracts, which a company-close source said made up as much as 70% of recent revenue, are the product two appeals courts and Utah’s criminal case treat as state-regulable gambling, so the new valuation prices in a legal outcome that is still being litigated. The central unresolved tension is whether Kalshi’s event contracts are CFTC-supervised financial instruments or state-law gambling: that classification, not the fundraising itself, determines whether the growth narrative or the enforcement narrative is the binding constraint.
2 sources
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.