Job Openings Rise in September
Left 25%
Center 0%
Right 75%
1 left · 0 center · 3 right
What happened
On Tuesday, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics released September results from its Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. Job openings rose to 7.52 million, up 333,000 from a revised 7.19 million in August, taking the openings rate to 4.5 percent from 4.3 percent and coming in above the Dow Jones consensus of 7.15 million. Hires increased by 131,000 to 5.4 million; quits rose by 321,000 to 3.36 million, the highest since March 2025; and layoffs and discharges fell by 127,000 to 1.64 million, the lowest since March 2025. Openings increased in manufacturing by 54,000, in professional and business services by 106,000, and in state and local government by 108,000. The release preceded Friday’s October nonfarm payrolls report; the separate September employment report had shown employers added 29,000 jobs.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 4 articles
2 of 4 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 2 of 4
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Bureau of Labor Statistics
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 4 of 4
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: JOLTS report, Bureau of Labor Statistics data, official statistics
- Credits another outlet 0 of 4
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
- Unnamed sources 0 of 4
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Nov 3, 15:37 UTC by CNBC, naming its source. First document in the first report, from CNBC (JOLTS report).
- Not counted 0
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
The openings jump reads as a broad demand rebound in left-leaning coverage, while right-leaning coverage either skips the industry mix or treats the gain as a government story, omitting a private-sector rise nearly as large as the public one. Readers who saw only the right would not know that a major private industry added almost as many openings as state and local government. State and local government accounted for roughly one-third of the nationwide increase in the Daily Caller account. Left-leaning coverage at CNBC reported that professional and business services openings rose by 106,000, a figure right-leaning outlets do not carry.
Left-leaning coverage billed the same report as a "positive sign" for the labor market. Hiring was described as a "modest improvement" in the Daily Caller account.
None of the coverage asks why September openings jumped while September payrolls barely rose.
Bottom line
Daily Caller skipped the professional-services openings CNBC put at 106,000. That is how the September JOLTS gain reads as a government caveat on the right and a labor-market rebound on the left.
The receipts — 3 facts one side's coverage lacks
- Layoffs and discharges fell by 127,000 to 1.64 million
- Federal job openings were at a much lower level than during the Biden administration after Trump attempted to eliminate thousands of federal positions
- The quits rate increased to 2.1 percent from 1.9 percent
The Left View
CNBC called the report a “positive sign for labor market” ahead of the payrolls release, saying openings “surged” well above the Dow Jones outlook while hiring rose and layoffs dropped. It treated the jump in quits as “a barometer for worker confidence in finding new jobs after leaving their prior positions.”
The Right View
Breitbart said openings “unexpectedly rose” above all estimates in the Econoday survey and that workers felt “increasingly emboldened to quit,” interpreting the combination with lower layoffs as “surging demand for workers as the economy headed into the fourth quarter.” The Daily Caller stressed that state and local government accounted for “roughly one-third of the nationwide monthly increase,” rather than private-sector employers, and that federal openings were “at a much lower level than they were during the Biden administration” after President Donald Trump “attempted to eliminate thousands of federal positions.” It described hiring as a “modest improvement” without employers “substantially accelerating workforce expansion,” and situated the figures against September’s 29,000 payroll gain and Americans continuing to “grapple with elevated living costs.”
Our Take (balanced)
Left-leaning coverage’s strongest argument is that a consensus-beating openings increase, rising hires, a quits surge presented as worker confidence, and layoffs at their lowest since March 2025 show labor demand strengthening before the next payrolls print. The right’s strongest argument, pressed by the Daily Caller, is that about a third of the openings gain was in state and local government, so the headline overstates private-sector demand relative to September’s 29,000 payroll increase and ongoing cost-of-living pressure. The central unresolved tension is whether the JOLTS bounce marks a broad labor-market reacceleration or a government-skewed rise in vacancies that has not shown up in payroll job creation.
4 sources
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.