OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Abdul El-Sayed Faces Islamophobia Claims in Michigan Race

5 sources · updated 2026-11-04
Left 20% Center 0% Right 80%
1 left · 0 center · 4 right

What happened

Abdul El-Sayed, the Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan, closed the campaign against Republican Mike Rogers in a race that would make him the first Muslim U.S. senator if he won. On the Sunday before Election Day, former Democratic primary rival Rep. Haley Stevens endorsed Rogers after El-Sayed declined to condemn a PAC advertisement linking high grocery prices to U.S. spending on Israeli military aid. In a 60 Minutes interview that aired that night, El-Sayed answered “yes” when asked whether Palestine has a right to exist, then said of Israel’s right to exist, “Yes, if there is a shared understanding,” and that he would support two states or one shared state if Israelis and Palestinians chose either on equal terms. Attacks in the race included President Donald Trump calling El-Sayed a “jihadist,” Republican efforts to connect him to the Muslim Brotherhood over a 2012 letter he signed backing Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi, a mailer placing El-Sayed’s face next to the World Trade Center towers, and criticism of his appearances with streamer Hasan Piker. On CNN, Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-MI) called the Michigan campaign the most “disgusting, vile, hateful” she had ever seen, citing both antisemitism and hateful ads targeting Arab American and Muslim communities.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 5 articles

4 of 4 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 4 of 4
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Mallory McMorrow, Layla Elabed, Abdul El-Sayed, Ross Douthat, Rep. Debbie Dingell and Jake Tapper
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 4
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
Credits another outlet 0 of 4
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 4
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Nov 2, 10:07 UTC by Daily Wire, naming its source.
Not counted 1
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

The coverage splits the closing fight in half: left-leaning outlets skip El-Sayed's Israel answers, and right-leaning outlets skip the Islamophobic attacks on him. Left-leaning coverage in the Intercept describes Stevens branding him an antisemite over a PAC ad on Israeli aid, but never reports his reply that Israel's existence depends on "a shared understanding." Right-leaning coverage reports that reply and his campaign appearances with Hasan Piker, yet never mentions a mailer putting his face beside the Twin Towers. Left-leaning coverage tags opponent attacks as Islamophobic, including Trump's "jihadist" line. Right-leaning coverage, in the Daily Wire, tags El-Sayed's camp as a hate movement that would come for Christians after the Jews. What did El-Sayed say, in his own words, when asked to condemn the grocery-price ad?
Bottom line

The Intercept never quotes El-Sayed on Israel's right to exist, even as it treats Stevens's antisemitism charge as a late plot twist. Daily Wire readers get that hedge without Trump calling him a jihadist.

The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • El-Sayed said Israel has a right to exist if there is a shared understanding official statementin Daily Wire · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • El-Sayed signed a 2012 letter backing Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood official statementin Daily Wire · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • After a truck rammed Temple Israel in West Bloomfield, El-Sayed said hurt people hurt people official statementin Daily Wire · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • 38 percent of Michigan voters said they would be less likely to vote for a Muslim candidate numberin The Intercept · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Hasan Piker, who campaigned with El-Sayed, said America deserved 9/11 contextin Daily Wire · absent from left-leaning coverage
The Left View
The Intercept treats the Israel-and-antisemitism push as a late overlay on a race it says has been defined by Islamophobia, citing Trump’s “jihadist” label, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s “racist rant against Arabs,” the Twin Towers mailer, and Michigan state Sen. Mallory McMorrow’s description of “the most bigoted, hateful, Islamophobic campaign I’ve ever seen.” It reports that Rogers “repeatedly tried to tie” El-Sayed to the Muslim Brotherhood while insisting the attacks “have nothing to do with faith,” a distinction the outlet says Muslim Republicans and other observers reject; a poll found 38 percent of Michigan voters would be less likely to vote for a Muslim candidate. Dearborn organizers, including Layla Elabed of Arab Americans for Progress — an outgrowth of the Uncommitted movement that urged Michigan Democrats to withhold support from Joe Biden in the 2024 primary over Gaza — compared excitement to Barack Obama’s 2008 run and said Stevens’s defection fit “a pattern of putting political interests ahead of the people she was elected to represent.” They argue the same anti-war coalition is now turning out for El-Sayed, that elite discrimination can mobilize targeted communities, and that Stevens’s endorsement of Rogers produced a one-day fundraising record for his campaign.
The Right View
The Daily Wire and Breitbart frame the scrutiny as El-Sayed’s record on Israel and his associations, not his religion. They emphasize that he answered “yes” on Palestine’s right to exist “without hesitation” but conditioned Israel’s on “a shared understanding,” and they cite a May recording from a “Jews for Abdul” event in which he said he “struggles” with Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state and accused Israel of apartheid. They highlight his “hurt people hurt people” remark after a truck rammed Temple Israel in West Bloomfield, appearances with Piker — who has said “America deserved 9/11” and compared Israel to “Jewish ISIS” — a leaked instruction that staff stay quiet about a U.S.-Israeli strike so as not to upset Dearborn voters, and the 2012 Morsi letter. Rogers told Ben Shapiro that El-Sayed would lead a “democrat socialist movement” with “a special sauce of Muslim Brotherhood sprinkled through,” that “when they’re done with the Jews” Christians would be “next,” and that Stevens’s break was a “courageous act” after El-Sayed “tossed her out” for asking him to call out an ad Rogers said blamed Jews for the price of bananas. Asked about Jewish voters’ concerns over those associations, Dingell said “the rise of antisemitism is real, because of this hate,” that “the hate is real,” and that “the fear of violence in community is real,” while also noting hateful ads against Arab and Muslim communities.
Our Take (balanced)
The left’s strongest argument is that explicitly bigoted attacks are on the record — a president calling the nominee a “jihadist,” a Twin Towers mailer, McMorrow’s “most bigoted” characterization, and a poll showing 38 percent of Michigan voters less likely to support a Muslim — so Stevens’s last-minute Republican endorsement and the Israel focus can reasonably be read as continuous with that atmosphere, not a separate merits debate. The right’s strongest argument is El-Sayed’s own sequencing and associations: an immediate “yes” for Palestine versus “Yes, if there is a shared understanding” for Israel, prior comments that he “struggles” with a Jewish state, refusal to condemn the grocery-and-aid ad, and a high-profile alliance with Piker, which can be criticized without accepting Islamophobic framing. The central unresolved tension is whether those Israel and association issues are separable from the Islamophobic attacks that have also defined the race, or whether they collapse into one fight over whether a Muslim progressive’s foreign-policy coalition is ordinary opposition or a vehicle for hate.

5 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.