DoorDash in Talks to Acquire Instacart in $17 Billion Deal
Left 33%
Center 0%
Right 67%
1 left · 0 center · 2 right
What happened
DoorDash is in advanced talks to acquire grocery-delivery company Instacart in a deal that could value Instacart at about $17 billion, possibly as soon as Wednesday though none is guaranteed, and Instacart’s talks with Uber are no longer active. The Wall Street Journal first reported the story on 2026-10-26, citing people familiar with the discussions; New York Post and Fox Business credited the Journal as the origin, and the first on-record source was Nick Smith (New York Post, 2026-10-26). Instacart, which had a market value of about $13 billion as of Friday’s close versus DoorDash’s about $73 billion, saw its shares rise about 8% while DoorDash fell around 6%; Instacart declined to comment, and Uber and DoorDash did not immediately respond. Separately, Instacart said in a Monday SEC filing that its board had approved winding down the Caper Cart smart-shopping-cart unit by the second quarter of 2027, expecting $55 million to $80 million in pre-tax charges including employee and contract terminations, with savings to be reinvested in “strategic growth initiatives.” Caper carts—which Instacart in early 2024 said it planned to roll out by the thousands—used cameras and sensors to weigh produce, track items, apply coupons, take payment, and show ads; then-CEO Fidji Simo said at the time, “We really believe that it’s going to be the future of grocery shopping.”
Sourcing check · Partly on the record · 3 articles
1 of 3 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report. Most articles credit The Wall Street Journal rather than reporting it themselves.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 1 of 3
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Nick Smith
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 2 of 3
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: SEC filing, market data
- Credits another outlet 2 of 3
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: The Wall Street Journal
- Unnamed sources 2 of 3
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 26, 21:13 UTC by Business Insider, naming its source. First document in the first report, from Business Insider (SEC filing).
- Not counted 0
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
Left-leaning coverage never reports that DoorDash is trying to buy Instacart, so readers there would not know a sale of the grocery platform is even in play. Right-leaning coverage is more complete, and the New York Post describes advanced talks that could value Instacart at about $17 billion. Instead, left-leaning coverage at Business Insider is confined to Instacart shutting down its Caper smart-cart program.
Right-leaning coverage leads with the takeover, and the New York Post adds the cart shutdown only at the end as a separate filing. Left-leaning coverage opens on Instacart walking away from technology it had hailed as "the future of grocery shopping."
What would Instacart shareholders actually receive if a DoorDash deal closed?
Bottom line
You could read Business Insider on Instacart and never learn that DoorDash was in talks to buy the company for about $17 billion.
The receipts — 4 facts one side's coverage lacks
- DoorDash is in advanced talks to acquire Instacart in a deal that could value it at about $17 billion
- A deal may be finalized as soon as Wednesday
- Instacart had a market value of about $13 billion before the talks were reported
- Instacart previously considered a sale in 2021
The Left View
Business Insider frames the Caper shutdown as Instacart abandoning technology it had publicly cast as grocery’s future, setting Simo’s 2024 line that it would be “the future of grocery shopping” against the board-approved wind-down. It presents Caper as one of Instacart’s most visible retail-tech efforts after the 2012 delivery startup diversified into selling technology to retailers, including carts that could serve tailored ads, and notes that Amazon, which makes a similar cart, said at the start of 2026 that it planned to start using a new version at Whole Foods Market stores.
The Right View
New York Post and Fox Business present the talks as a combination that would give DoorDash Instacart’s marketplace and retailer ties alongside DoorDash’s delivery network, as delivery firms expand into grocery after the pandemic-driven boom in online ordering faded. They quote Nick Smith saying DoorDash “looks like the more natural fit for Instacart, given the complementary strengths of its restaurant delivery network and Instacart’s grocery expertise,” and that an Uber deal would make sense only if it delivered “incremental customer value and profitable growth — not simply greater scale.” The coverage situates the talks against rising labor costs, tighter regulation of delivery workers, grocery-delivery competition from Walmart and Amazon, and DoorDash’s prior acquisitions of Deliveroo (effective in 2025 after court approval) and Wolt (2022).
Our Take (balanced)
Left-leaning coverage’s strongest argument is that Instacart is retreating from a flagship in-store technology bet, evidenced by the contrast between Simo’s “future of grocery shopping” claim and the costly, board-approved Caper wind-down while Amazon continues a parallel cart effort at Whole Foods. Right-leaning coverage’s strongest argument is that DoorDash is the complementary buyer for Instacart’s grocery marketplace amid post-boom cost, regulatory, and competitive pressure, evidenced by Smith’s “more natural fit” assessment and DoorDash’s Deliveroo and Wolt expansions. The central unresolved tension is whether this is primarily a story of Instacart abandoning a hyped retail-tech vision—with sale talks as a sequel to that retrenchment—or a story of strategic delivery consolidation in which grocery assets are valuable complementary scale.
3 sources
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.