Democrats Eye Undoing Electoral College After Midterm Wins
Left 75%
Center 0%
Right 25%
3 left · 0 center · 1 right
What happened
In the 2026 U.S. midterm elections, Democratic House candidates won an estimated 259 seats and 55.3 percent of the national House popular vote to Republicans’ 43.3 percent. Democrats also won unified control of the governorship and both legislative chambers in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Nevada. The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact — already adopted by 18 states and the District of Columbia, totaling 222 electoral votes — would require member states to award their electoral votes to the national popular-vote winner and would take effect only if it reaches 270 electoral votes. After the election, several lawmakers told The New York Times they had begun discussing legislation for the next session aimed at having those newly unified Democratic states join the compact, and Michigan state Representative Carrie Rheingans said the results would “help push this forward across the whole nation.” Notre Dame election-law expert Derek Muller said interstate compacts traditionally require approval from Congress and the president and that “there will be a lot of challenges” if enough states join; a previous Nevada attempt to join was vetoed by the state’s Democratic governor in 2019.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 4 articles
2 of 2 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 2 of 2
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: The Associated Press, Leslie Martes, Heather Williams, Derek Muller, New York Times and Michigan state Rep. Carrie Rheingans
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 2
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
- Credits another outlet 0 of 2
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
- Unnamed sources 1 of 2
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this. Here: e.g. “Several lawmakers told the New York Times”
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Nov 6, 17:41 UTC by Daily Wire, naming its source.
- Not counted 2
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
Left-leaning coverage never mentions any effort to elect presidents by national popular vote, while right-leaning coverage treats that effort as the main follow-through on the midterm. House gains and a new class of primary kingmakers fill the NBC News account instead, along with talk of investigations and early-state endorsements. Control of the governor's office and both legislative chambers in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Nevada is what the Daily Wire says could let those states join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact and activate it.
The House popular-vote edge leads the NBC News newsletter. A plan to "fundamentally change" how the country chooses a president leads the Daily Wire.
Have any of the newly elected governors said they would sign compact legislation?
Bottom line
NBC News sized up the midterm as House gains and primary kingmakers without mentioning the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, which the Daily Wire reports already holds 222 electoral votes.
The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
- The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is already approved by 18 states and the District of Columbia, amounting to 222 electoral votes, and takes effect at 270
- Michigan state Rep. Carrie Rheingans said the midterm result would help push the compact forward across the whole nation
- Notre Dame election law expert Derek Muller said interstate compacts traditionally require approval from Congress and the president
- A previous Nevada attempt to join the compact was vetoed by the state's Democratic governor in 2019
- A YouGov poll from June 2026 found that 56% of adults think a president should be elected by popular vote rather than the Electoral College
The Left View
NBC News framed the midterms as a historic Democratic wave, calling the House performance “obviously big” and, on a historical look, “massive”: the second-biggest House popular-vote edge in 50 years and the largest midterm margin for one party since 1974 — larger than Democrats’ 2008 and 2018 waves and Republicans’ 1994, 2010, and 2014 waves. It reported that battleground districts moved almost 17 points toward Democrats relative to the 2024 presidential margin there, with the biggest swings in South Texas among Latino voters. Its forward-looking emphasis was that new Democratic governors or senators in five of the six states that will lead the party’s 2028 presidential primary calendar “could become 2028 presidential power brokers,” highlighting Annie Andrews as the first Democrat elected to the Senate from South Carolina since 1998 after the DNC voted in August to put that state first on the calendar; former DNC chair Jamie Harrison said she would “be extremely popular with all the 2028 folks.” The NBC coverage did not discuss the Electoral College or the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.
The Right View
The Daily Wire said Democrats had been “quick to float several ideas” after the “sweeping blue wave,” “one of them” being “to fundamentally change the way the United States elects a president” by trying to activate the compact through the five states where Democrats now hold unified government. It reported that lawmakers had already begun discussing legislation and hoped to succeed before 2028, and quoted Rheingans that “this blue tsunami is really going to help push this forward across the whole nation.” It noted Muller’s warning of legal challenges and the need for congressional and presidential approval, the 2019 Nevada veto, that George W. Bush in 2000 and Donald Trump in 2016 won the presidency while losing the popular vote, and a June 2026 YouGov poll finding 56 percent of adults think a president should be elected by popular vote rather than the Electoral College.
Our Take (balanced)
Left-leaning coverage did not address Electoral College reform; its strongest argument about the same election is that the results were a historically large wave with lasting effects on the 2028 nomination, supported by NBC’s comparison to 1974 and by new Democratic statewide winners in early-primary states. Right-leaning coverage’s strongest argument is that Democrats intend to use unified control in five additional states to activate the compact before 2028, supported by lawmakers telling the Times they had already begun discussing bills and by Rheingans’s statement that the “blue tsunami” would “help push this forward across the whole nation.” The central unresolved tension is whether the midterm gains are mainly a conventional transfer of congressional and primary-calendar influence, or a viable path to replacing the Electoral College with a national popular vote through a compact that experts say would face serious legal challenges, including over whether it needs congressional and presidential approval.
4 sources
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.