OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Democrats Accused of Voter Confusion Scheme in Alaska Senate Race

6 sources · updated 2026-10-31
Left 0% Center 0% Right 100%
0 left · 0 center · 6 right

What happened

Incumbent Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan of Alaska is on the November U.S. Senate ballot against Democrat Mary Peltola and a second candidate also named Dan Sullivan. A New York Times report said Democrats recruited that second candidate. Sen. Sullivan said on Fox News that Peltola's campaign team and senior DSCC Democrats spent more than a year on the recruitment; Attorney General Todd Blanche said Democrats were attempting to dupe voters and that it should be illegal. House Oversight Chairman James Comer called the effort coordinated deception. Peltola's campaign has denied involvement.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 6 articles

4 of 4 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 4 of 4
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Sen. Dan Sullivan, Attorney General Todd Blanche, Whoopi Goldberg, Joy Behar, Alyssa Farah Griffin and Rep. James Comer
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 4
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
Credits another outlet 0 of 4
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 4
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 29, 17:01 UTC by Breitbart, naming its source.
Not counted 2
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
ONE-SIDED THIS WEEK. Only right-leaning outlets have covered this story in the last two days; The Guardian reported it on 2026-10-28.
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Left-leaning coverage has not reported this story at all. Right-leaning coverage reports that Democrats recruited a second Dan Sullivan onto Alaska's Senate ballot to confuse voters. Sen. Dan Sullivan said that Peltola's campaign team and senior DSCC Democrats ran a secret scheme and then lied about it. Attorney General Todd Blanche said they were attempting to dupe voters and that it should be illegal. Right-leaning coverage also notes that Peltola's campaign has denied playing a part. A reader who sees only left-leaning outlets would not encounter the allegation, the denial, or the dispute over whether the tactic broke the law. Right-leaning pieces split on legality: one quotes a View host saying the same-name listing "isn't illegal," while Rep. James Comer called it "cheating." Does Alaska law forbid recruiting a same-name candidate, and did money change hands to put the second Sullivan on the ballot?
Bottom line

Breitbart has run multiple stories on an alleged plot to put a second Dan Sullivan on Alaska's Senate ballot; left-leaning coverage has not reported it, even as those pieces quote a host saying the listing isn't illegal.

The receipts — 3 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Sen. Dan Sullivan said the scheme went to Schumer and Gillibrand. official statementin Breitbart · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Rep. James Comer said the Department of Justice is issuing subpoenas. official statementin Breitbart · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • The effort was described as in the works for over a year. numberin Breitbart · absent from left-leaning coverage
The Right View
Breitbart and The Daily Wire framed the second Dan Sullivan as a Democratic decoy plot to confuse Alaska voters and siphon support from the incumbent. They quoted Sen. Sullivan calling it a year-plus secret scheme involving Peltola's team and national Democrats, Blanche saying it should be illegal, and Comer calling it cheating, citing text messages, possible money transfers, and DOJ subpoenas. Coverage of ABC's The View noted hosts first questioning why a same-name candidate was a problem, then after the Times report calling the tactic shady, sloppy, and dumb, while some compared it to Republican tricks and suggested Peltola may not have known.
Our Take (balanced)
The story is substantive: it involves a real second candidate of the same name on a statewide ballot, named public officials, a New York Times report, and references to campaign text messages and a Justice Department inquiry. Established is that two Dan Sullivans appear on the Alaska Senate ballot and that Sullivan, Blanche, and Comer have publicly condemned a Democratic recruitment effort described in that reporting. Remaining alleged are criminal violations, Peltola's personal knowledge, and direction from national Democratic leaders. No left-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch for the underlying documents, DOJ or court filings, and detailed on-the-record responses from Peltola and the DSCC.

6 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.