OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Data Centers Become Flashpoint in Midterm Campaigns

4 sources · updated 2026-10-30
Left 50% Center 50% Right 0%
2 left · 2 center · 0 right

What happened

Opposition to new data centers has become a campaign issue ahead of the November 3 midterm elections, with protests, lawsuits, and local ballot measures in states including Arizona, Ohio, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Tennessee. The NAACP and Memphis-based Young, Gifted & Green launched a nationwide “Climate on Your Ballot” dashboard that maps 1,727 data centers and lets voters look up candidates’ environmental positions. In Page, Arizona, the City Council approved the sale of 500 acres for a proposed $10 billion data center; residents circulated petitions, and voters ousted the mayor in July. In Ohio, more than a dozen local referendums related to data-center construction will appear on ballots, and Democratic Senate candidate Sherrod Brown has attacked Republican Sen. Jon Husted over tax incentives that drew tech companies. Researchers at the University of California-Riverside have modeled air-pollution health effects from backup generators, while the Data Center Coalition says generator use is minimal and existing regulations limit emissions.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 4 articles

2 of 4 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 2 of 4
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Abre’ Conner, NAACP, Young, Gifted & Green, Doug Herrera and Lee Hannah
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 4
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
Credits another outlet 0 of 4
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 4
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 29, 09:00 UTC by CBS News, naming its source.
Not counted 0
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
BLINDSPOT. Only left-leaning outlets are covering this story — the other side's media is silent.
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Left-leaning coverage presents the midterm data-center fight as a Black civil-rights campaign built around an NAACP voter dashboard, and never reports the health-mortality modeling or the competitive races using the facilities as attack lines. Right-leaning outlets had not covered the story as of publication. A reader of Mother Jones, and anyone on the silent side, would miss both the projected yearly death toll from emissions and an Ohio Senate ad that brands a Republican incumbent as the "face of data centers." Left-leaning coverage leads with the dashboard and with whether Black residents will see higher electricity bills. The pollution lawsuits and a gas-turbine fight in Memphis appear only in a closing roundup. It never opens on illness or on named candidates already on the ballot. Have researchers measured actual illness beside data centers already running, or is the campaign still running on projections?
Bottom line

Mother Jones never told readers that data-center emissions have been modeled at nearly 1,300 deaths a year, and right-leaning outlets have not touched the story.

The receipts — 4 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Modeling led by University of California-Riverside researchers found data-center emissions could cause nearly 1,300 deaths annually by 2030. numberin CBS News · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • The NAACP Climate on Your Ballot platform tracks 1,727 data centers nationwide. numberin Mother Jones · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Sixty percent of data-center capacity under construction is in states Donald Trump won by five percentage points or more. numberin CBS News · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • The Data Center Coalition said a review of Virginia found that use of backup power sources, including diesel generators, is minimal. official statementin CBS News · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
Mother Jones, reproducing Capital B as part of the Climate Desk collaboration, reported that the NAACP dashboard is meant to help Black communities raise electricity-bill, water-use, pollution, and notice concerns at the ballot box, citing rezoning fights in Clarksdale, Mississippi; confidentiality around Meta’s Richland Parish, Louisiana, project; an NAACP lawsuit alleging xAI ran 27 unpermitted gas turbines near Memphis; and a seven-state survey in which 52 percent of Black voters expected data centers to raise household power costs. CBS News and KFF Health News reported that health worries—air pollution from diesel and gas backup power, noise, light, heat islands, and cooling-system chemicals—are dividing candidates in Trump-won states where most new capacity is planned, including Arizona’s competitive 1st Congressional District and Ohio’s Senate race, and cited a Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll finding two in three Americans oppose new U.S. data centers.
Our Take (balanced)
The story is substantive: it rests on named groups, a public voter tool, specific lawsuits and rezoning disputes, named candidates, local ballot measures, and published polling and modeling rather than a single uncorroborated claim. Established facts include the dashboard launch, Page’s land-sale approval and July mayoral ouster, Ohio’s cluster of local referendums, Brown’s attacks on Husted, the NAACP’s suit over alleged unpermitted turbines, and the poll numbers as reported. Health figures such as nearly 1,300 modeled deaths a year by 2030 are projections, not observed outcomes; industry groups dispute the scale of backup-generator use. No right-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch for candidate replies on the NAACP dashboard, November 3 results in Arizona’s 1st District and Ohio, court and permit rulings on the xAI turbines and Clarksdale rezoning, and any utility-commission or public-health findings on costs and emissions.

4 sources

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.