Cook Report Shifts Senate Races as GOP Pulls Funds
Left 50%
Center 0%
Right 50%
1 left · 0 center · 1 right
What happened
On Tuesday, the Cook Political Report, a nonpartisan election handicapper, moved Minnesota's U.S. Senate race from likely Democrat to lean Democrat and South Carolina's from likely Republican to lean Republican. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., campaigning in Fremont, Nebraska, for Sen. Pete Ricketts ahead of the Nov. 3 midterms, said Republicans would outperform the polls and retain their 53-to-47 Senate majority. The Senate Leadership Fund, a PAC aligned with Thune, moved spending from Georgia — where it had pledged $44 million to Rep. Mike Collins against Sen. Jon Ossoff, who has led in polling — to Kansas, where Sen. Roger Marshall is in an unexpectedly close race, and pulled nearly all of its spending from North Carolina, where former Republican National Committee co-chair Michael Whatley faces former Gov. Roy Cooper for retiring Sen. Thom Tillis's seat. President Donald Trump held a rally for Whatley and told reporters, "I think he's a great man, and I am worried about him."
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 2 articles
2 of 2 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 2 of 2
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Cook Political Report, John Thune and Senate Leadership Fund
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 2
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
- Credits another outlet 0 of 2
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
- Unnamed sources 0 of 2
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 20, 18:44 UTC by The Hill, naming its source.
- Not counted 0
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
Neither side puts Cook's Minnesota shift in the same account as the GOP's withdrawal of Senate money. Left-leaning coverage reports Minnesota moving from likely to lean Democrat and is silent on any fund pullback. Right-leaning coverage describes outside groups leaving Georgia and North Carolina and cites Cook for toss-ups and seats shifting toward Democrats. Seeing only one version, a reader cannot tell whether the cash is following the ratings or abandoning a map Cook still treats as mixed.
Right-leaning coverage leads with Thune on the trail and the cash pullback. Left-leaning coverage leads with Cook and the claim that the moves give each party "something to be hopeful about." Fox News introduces Cook after Thune. The Hill never reaches the Senate Leadership Fund.
What does Cook now rate Georgia, North Carolina, and Kansas, the races where the money actually moved?
Bottom line
Read The Hill and you never hear that GOP money left Georgia after a $44 million pledge. Read Fox News and you never hear Cook moved Minnesota from likely to lean Democrat.
The Left View
The Hill framed Cook's revisions as mixed news that gave "each party something to be hopeful about" in the homestretch, presenting Minnesota's shift as a Republican opening and South Carolina's as a Democratic one. It stressed Cook's nonpartisan status and kept the focus on how the rating changes still left Republicans hoping to flip an open Senate seat.
The Right View
Fox News centered Thune's prediction that Republicans will "outperform the polls for sure" and are "not giving up on any of them," arguing that current surveys "under-reflect the Republican vote" as they have in past elections. It treated the Georgia-to-Kansas spending shift and the North Carolina pullback as triage among "jump balls" and "margin of error races," quoting Thune that turnout of "low propensity, particularly Trump, voters" and "winning the middle of the electorate" will decide the majority, while also noting Trump's on-the-record worry about Whatley.
Our Take (balanced)
The left-leaning coverage's strongest argument is that a nonpartisan handicapper has made once-safer Republican seats only lean Republican, a judgment that lines up with GOP outside groups cutting North Carolina spending and abandoning the Georgia plan. The right-leaning coverage's strongest argument is Thune's claim, tied to prior cycles, that polling "under-reflects the Republican vote" and that turnout of low-propensity Trump voters can still win races inside the margin of error. The central unresolved tension is whether Cook's downgrades and the Senate Leadership Fund's pullbacks show the 53-47 majority slipping, or whether they will be overtaken by a Republican electorate Thune says the polls are missing.
2 sources
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.