Charlamagne Criticizes Nicki Minaj for Attacking Hochul But Not Trump
Left 50%
Center 0%
Right 50%
1 left · 0 center · 1 right
What happened
Rapper Nicki Minaj posted on X calling New York Gov. Kathy Hochul an "evil woman" and urging Black voters and Christians to support Republican Bruce Blakeman in the Nov. 3 gubernatorial election, accusing Hochul of staying silent on harm to innocent people. Minaj highlighted Hochul's 2024 remark that there were "Black kids growing up in the Bronx who don't even know what the word 'computer' is," which Hochul said she misspoke and regretted, and a 2025 joke at True Bethel Baptist Church about stopping by a liquor store. Asked about the posts, Hochul said Minaj had been "poisoned by Donald Trump" and that after "Donald Trump and MAGA world has vanished, and they go back into their dark holes where they came from," people like Minaj might realize they were "fed a vision of this country that is not what Americans feel." Minaj has publicly backed Trump, including an Oct. 25 appearance with him at a Republican rally in Port Huron, Michigan, where she said she would "continue to support you forever and ever." Radio host Charlamagne tha God criticized Minaj for attacking Hochul without applying the same scrutiny to Trump.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 2 articles
1 of 1 article cites a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 1 of 1
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Nicki Minaj and Kathy Hochul
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 1
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
- Credits another outlet 0 of 1
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
- Unnamed sources 0 of 1
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 30, 21:18 UTC by Fox News, naming its source.
- Not counted 1
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
Left-leaning coverage never reports Nicki Minaj's posts branding Kathy Hochul an "evil woman" or how the governor answered, so Charlamagne's charge that she spares the politicians she supports has no documented fight behind it. The only text on that side is Charlamagne's demand for an explanation, carried by The Hill. A reader of that account cannot see the attack he is answering or the alliance he says she refuses to scrutinize, and so cannot judge the charge. Right-leaning coverage on Fox News reconstructs the exchange and her onstage pledge of ongoing Trump support and never mentions Charlamagne.
Left-leaning coverage quotes a critique of "the people she adamantly supports." Right-leaning coverage quotes the governor saying Minaj had been "poisoned by Donald Trump."
Has Minaj ever publicly condemned Donald Trump for staying silent on harm to the innocent, the charge she leveled at Hochul?
Bottom line
The Hill ran Charlamagne scolding Nicki Minaj for going after Hochul instead of Trump without printing her posts. Fox News printed those posts and Hochul's "poisoned by Donald Trump" reply and left Charlamagne out.
The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
- Nicki Minaj posted that Kathy Hochul is an "evil woman" and urged a vote for Republican Bruce Blakeman
- Charlamagne said he needs Minaj to explain why the same scrutiny does not apply to the people she adamantly supports
- Hochul said in 2024 that Black kids in the Bronx don't even know what the word computer is, then said she misspoke and regretted it
- Hochul told a predominantly Black congregation not to stop by the liquor store and to buy food for the kids
- Minaj wrote that Hochul did not denounce evil when she had the chance and will not escape God's wrath
The Left View
The Hill, conveying Charlamagne tha God's criticism, treats Minaj's attack as selective rather than a full moral accounting. Charlamagne said Minaj is "entitled to her politics," but that "moral authority requires more than condemning the people you oppose," and that she needs "to explain why the same scrutiny doesn't apply to the people she adamantly supports." The left framing is that condemning Hochul in religious terms while remaining a vocal Trump ally undercuts any claim to consistent principle.
The Right View
Fox News frames Minaj as calling out Hochul over the Bronx computer remark and the church liquor-store joke and as pushing a vote for Blakeman, while presenting Hochul's reply as a Trump jab that did not engage those points. It notes social-media users split between those who say constituents should ignore celebrities and judge Hochul's resume and those who side with Minaj or argue that Hochul's "dark holes" line itself divided voters. The coverage ties Minaj's posts to her campaign-trail support for Trump and Republican candidates.
Our Take (balanced)
The left's strongest argument is Charlamagne's consistency test: Minaj's moral denunciation of Hochul lacks authority if she will not apply "the same scrutiny" to Trump, whom she has pledged to support "forever and ever." The right's strongest argument is that Minaj cited specific Hochul comments about Black children and a Black congregation, and Hochul answered by saying Minaj was "poisoned" by Trump rather than addressing those remarks. The central unresolved tension is whether the story is mainly about Minaj's partisan double standard or about whether Hochul's comments and Trump-centered rebuttal respond to the voters Minaj invoked.
2 sources
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.