Anti-party candidates surge ahead of 2026 midterms
Left 33%
Center 67%
Right 0%
1 left · 2 center · 0 right
What happened
Ahead of the 2026 U.S. midterm elections, multiple Senate, House, and gubernatorial candidates in red and blue states are running as independents or downplaying party labels. In Texas, Democratic state Rep. James Talarico is polling competitively against Republican Ken Paxton for Senate; in Kansas, Methodist pastor Adam Hamilton is in a Cook Political Report tossup with Republican Sen. Roger Marshall, a seat Democrats have not won since 1932. Independent Senate candidates include union steamfitter Dan Osborn in Nebraska against Sen. Pete Ricketts, former Army Green Beret Seth Bodnar in Montana, Brian Bengs in South Dakota against Sen. Mike Rounds, and Todd Achilles in Idaho against Sen. Jim Risch. GOP pollster Patrick Ruffini of Echelon Insights told POLITICO that he believes polling is overstating Democrats’ chances of flipping Senate races in historically Republican territory.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 3 articles
1 of 2 articles cite a named source for the story. It started with unnamed sources; a named source appeared within the hour.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 1 of 2
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Cook Political Report
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 2
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
- Credits another outlet 0 of 2
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
- Unnamed sources 0 of 2
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 18, 11:45 UTC by Axios, with no named source. First named source within the hour, from Axios.
- Not counted 1
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
ONE-SIDED THIS WEEK.
Only left-leaning outlets have covered this story in the last two days;
Breitbart reported it on 2026-10-12.
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
Left-leaning coverage presents red-state Senate fights as a polling mirage, not an anti-party surge, and right-leaning outlets had not covered this as of publication. GOP pollster Patrick Ruffini told Politico that polling is overstating Democrats' chances in historically deep-red territory. That account omits the independent candidates contesting those seats and the Republican charge of "foul play." A reader of the silent side therefore misses the races, the outsiders, and the polling caveat alike.
Left-leaning coverage leads with a "warning sign for polling" rather than with Senate candidates downplaying party labels. The pollster interview never takes up the outsiders' shared claim that voters are tired of career politicians.
Are voters told when an independent Senate candidate previously ran as a Democrat?
Bottom line
Politico reduced the outsider Senate slate to a pollster's warning that a "blue wave may fall short," never naming the independents running without a D, and right-leaning outlets have not reported those candidacies.
The receipts — 2 facts one side's coverage lacks
- For many Republicans, quasi-Democrats running as independents amount to foul play.
- Seven House incumbents lost in Democratic primaries, tying a 21st-century high.
The Left View
POLITICO reported Echelon Insights pollster Patrick Ruffini arguing that surveys overstate Democratic chances of winning Senate seats in deep-red states and that a potential Democratic wave may fall short. Axios reported that unconventional candidates—including a Presbyterian seminarian in Texas, pastors in Kansas and elsewhere, former NFL sideline reporter Michele Tafoya in Minnesota, a smokejumper in Montana, a barista in Colorado, and several independents with military or labor backgrounds—are de-emphasizing party brands. Axios also documented competitive Democratic challenges to long Republican winning streaks in Kansas (no Democratic Senate win since 1932), Texas (since 1988), and South Carolina (since 1998), citing Cook ratings of tossup or likely Republican, while noting Republican competitiveness in Michigan’s Senate race and Oregon’s gubernatorial contest. Axios framed the pattern as voter anger at Washington and reported that some Republicans describe Democrats running as independents as an attempt to shed an unpopular party label.
Our Take (balanced)
The story is substantive: it rests on named candidates, specific races, Cook Political Report ratings, fundraising comparisons, and on-the-record comments from pollster Patrick Ruffini, not a single anonymous claim. Established facts include who is running, how they are labeling themselves, and the historical party streaks Axios cites; whether those races will flip, and whether current polls are accurate, remains unproven until results are in. Ruffini’s warning that polls overstate Democratic Senate chances is his professional assessment, not a verified outcome. No right-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch for updated public polling, Cook rating changes, candidate filings and party-label decisions, and official responses from the campaigns and national party committees.
3 sources
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.