60 Minutes Faces Scrutiny Over Deportee's Gay Asylum Claim
Left 0%
Center 0%
Right 100%
0 left · 0 center · 2 right
What happened
On Oct. 6, the Department of Homeland Security emailed CBS News that Moussa Diawara, a Malian national who overstayed a U.S. tourist visa, had claimed in a 2009 asylum application that he feared persecution in Mali because of his sexual orientation, while noting he is married to a woman with whom he has two children. About three weeks later, 60 Minutes aired a segment portraying Diawara as a deported father separated from his family in the United States and citing a 2012 U.S. judge’s finding that he could face persecution in Mali after converting to Christianity. The broadcast did not mention the sexual-orientation claim. After it aired, DHS General Counsel James Percival, who appeared in the piece, posted that Diawara’s claimed reason for fearing Mali was that he is gay. CBS News declined to comment. The New York Post first reported the DHS email.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 2 articles
1 of 2 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 1 of 2
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: James Percival
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 2 of 2
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: asylum application, email, DHS post
- Credits another outlet 0 of 2
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
- Unnamed sources 1 of 2
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 29, 14:26 UTC by Fox News, naming its source. First document in the first report, from Fox News (asylum application).
- Not counted 0
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
BLINDSPOT.
Only right-leaning outlets are covering this story
— the other side's media is silent.
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
Left-leaning coverage has not reported this story at all. Right-leaning coverage reports that 60 Minutes aired a sympathetic segment about deported Malian father Moussa Diawara without saying he had claimed asylum as a gay man, even after DHS emailed the network about that claim weeks before broadcast. That warning, carried by Fox News and the New York Post, reached CBS producers. A reader of the silent side would not know the family-man portrait went to air after the network had been told the earlier filing contradicted it.
Right-leaning outlets split on emphasis. The advance DHS warning leads Fox News. CBS Editor-in-Chief Bari Weiss and 60 Minutes boss Nick Bilton being kept in the dark leads the New York Post, which also reports producer Andy Court allegedly agreed with the subject's lawyer to keep the sexuality claim out.
Did the 2012 immigration judge withhold removal because of the Christianity conversion, the sexuality claim, or both?
Bottom line
Fox News published Diawara's 2009 asylum language about fearing execution as a gay man, a filing that never appeared in the 60 Minutes segment and that left-leaning coverage has not reported.
The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
- DHS emailed CBS News on Oct. 6 that Moussa Diawara, who is married with two children, claimed he would be persecuted for homosexuality if returned to Mali.
- Diawara's 2009 asylum application said he had experienced extreme punishment and persecution based on sexual orientation and could be executed if returned to Mali.
- A U.S. judge in 2012 ruled Diawara could not be deported to Mali because he had converted to Christianity.
- DHS General Counsel James Percival said after the segment that Diawara's claimed reason for fearing Mali was that he is gay.
- A CBS News source said the segment intentionally left out the gay claim to protect him.
The Right View
Fox News and the New York Post report that 60 Minutes received the Oct. 6 DHS notice yet omitted Diawara’s 2009 asylum language about fearing execution in Mali as a gay man, while highlighting Christianity conversion and family separation. They quote the application and Percival’s post calling Diawara a “poster child” for alleged wrongful deportations and immigration fraud. The Post, citing unnamed CBS sources, says producer Andy Court agreed with Diawara’s lawyer not to mention the gay claim, that Editor-in-Chief Bari Weiss and 60 Minutes boss Nick Bilton were not briefed and later “went ballistic,” and that the network is weighing discipline or firing of Court. A journalism professor called the omission a “self-inflicted wound.” CBS has not commented.
Our Take (balanced)
The story is substantive: it involves a named person, a dated DHS email, quoted 2009 asylum-application text, a comparable broadcast, and named CBS and DHS officials. Established: DHS told CBS on Oct. 6 about the sexual-orientation claim; the aired segment did not include it; Percival publicly flagged the discrepancy; CBS declined comment. Still alleged, via unnamed sources: that Court made a deal with the lawyer, that Weiss and Bilton were kept in the dark, and that firing or discipline is under review. No left-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch for a CBS statement or on-air update, any personnel action, fuller release of the email or file, and whether a later 60 Minutes broadcast addresses the omission.
2 sources
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.