Is ivermectin a safe and effective treatment or prophylaxis for COVID-19, warranting widespread clinical use?

“you are going to deny people Comparatively safe medications that address the disease very well and force them into an untested gene therapy that you know isn't effective and is very dangerous.”

“They did, and they pretended not to remember what R0, means in the epidem, epidemiological work. The fact that, hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin could be used to bring the R naught below one, which meant that they actually could end the pandemic in their own, right, because when R naught is less than one, the infection goes extinct of its own”

“hydroxychloroquine was perfectly safe during pregnancy we there's actually been randomized trials of using that in lupus I've used hydroxy in pregnant women ivermectin turned out to be safe we had monoclonal antibodies bamalivimab safe during pregnancy steroids”

“doctors were getting in trouble and losing their licenses for providing patients with medication that had not just efficacy, but there was, there was real studies that showed that, especially Uttar Pradesh in India, there's studies that showed that people that use these medications were more protected and were safer.”

“I would have to unsee the hundreds of patients that I saw over the past year. So that would be the short answer to your question. So I'd have to pretend that I didn't treat them. The studies are overwhelming.”

“that I'm someone who's lost in conspiracy theory, and that's fine. You, you're thinking that this is all a mass delusion, that everyone's a little enthusiastic, and they decide to study it, and their biases led to some false conclusion that it worked. And that's a really cute story, but it's just not true.”

“the Cochrane Institute in the UK is like, you know, the holy grail for analysis of drugs, and biologics, and, this process of meta-analysis. They kinda, they kinda wrote the rules for how to do it. And they had done an analysis that showed that ivermectin was quite effective.”

“Even still, if you go to the papers in which they showed that ivermectin was ineffective against COVID, these RCTs that we treat with religious reverence for no good reason. The papers actually say that even when you set up a study to fail, ivermectin is so effective that it still works. You have to look at the data. You”

“Of 62 cases where he got the court order and they actually got the ivermectin into the patient, they lived. Of the over a hundred, hundred cases where they didn't get the court order or they got the court order and they still blocked the ivermectin, they all died.”

“And there was a group that got ivermectin in the and continued during the hospitalization, and a group who didn't. So it's a very good, and it was a randomized trial, but it's very good, you know, it, heat of the pandemic here in Florida, lots of senior citizens getting sick. Ivermectin has over a fifty percent reduction in mortality.”

“I remember when we got to the story of ivermectin. I remember literally saying, what the fuck is this? Why would, why would we not be using a drug that has as much promise as this does in this case?”

“If you allow people to use ivermectin, they will discover how effective it is against COVID. Why? Because like hydroxychloroquine, it is actually generally useful over RNA viruses.”

“with a drug this safe, and it is as safe as any drug out there, the, you know, was it given to the people on the ship? It would be an obvious thing to do.”

“It doesn't just work on RNA viruses. It also works on helmets. It all, like, it works on so many things. And the idea that what you need, even though we've previously put this as one of our top medicines to use, if, you know, To use, both because it tends to be safe and it tends to be effective”

“we have a drug that was discovered due to its antiparasitic value that turns out to have broad-scale antiviral effectiveness, works against Most, if not all, single-stranded RNA viruses by a host of different mechanisms and is so safe that if there's a chance that you're infected with a single-stranded RNA virus, it's a good bet that it would reduce”

“one of the mechanisms of action of ivermectin is likely reduced, though not eliminated. There is still apparently coordination between the cytoplasmic activity and the, there's communication with the nucleus. So even that mechanism is likely still in play.”

“one of the things that unfolded in discussion about, hey, it's a single-stranded RNA virus, ivermectin is probably pretty useful, is there was a lot of pushback. There was the usual stuff about there's no evidence that, which is meaningless, especially the real problem for them with ivermectin is that it's so safe that the argument against giving it to”

“Why are we going to be facing RNA viruses? Why are we going to say, hey, ivermectin might work on that because it seems to work on all the others, and why is officialdom going to come back and tell us, no, you can't, it's dangerous, it's, there's no evidence, we have a randomized controlled trial that this, that, the”

“people are still confused about, about ivermectin, a drug which, for reasons I'm unclear on, is So safe that it is almost impossible to take enough of it to do significant damage to yourself.”

“It's won a Nobel Prize for use in humans.”

“when we got better studies later on with thousands of people, we found out that ivermectin did not work for COVID.”

“Whatever is going on with ivermectin, it's not saving bucket loads of really sick people. If it was, we'd see it clearly in the data, and we don't. ... the best data we have tells us that ivermectin really isn't doing much here.”

“you are going to deny people Comparatively safe medications that address the disease very well and force them into an untested gene therapy that you know isn't effective and is very dangerous.”

“one of the mechanisms of action of ivermectin is likely reduced, though not eliminated. There is still apparently coordination between the cytoplasmic activity and the, there's communication with the nucleus. So even that mechanism is likely still in play.”

“hydroxychloroquine was perfectly safe during pregnancy we there's actually been randomized trials of using that in lupus I've used hydroxy in pregnant women ivermectin turned out to be safe we had monoclonal antibodies bamalivimab safe during pregnancy steroids”

“doctors were getting in trouble and losing their licenses for providing patients with medication that had not just efficacy, but there was, there was real studies that showed that, especially Uttar Pradesh in India, there's studies that showed that people that use these medications were more protected and were safer.”

“Why are we going to be facing RNA viruses? Why are we going to say, hey, ivermectin might work on that because it seems to work on all the others, and why is officialdom going to come back and tell us, no, you can't, it's dangerous, it's, there's no evidence, we have a randomized controlled trial that this, that, the”

“They did, and they pretended not to remember what R0, means in the epidem, epidemiological work. The fact that, hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin could be used to bring the R naught below one, which meant that they actually could end the pandemic in their own, right, because when R naught is less than one, the infection goes extinct of its own”

“we have a drug that was discovered due to its antiparasitic value that turns out to have broad-scale antiviral effectiveness, works against Most, if not all, single-stranded RNA viruses by a host of different mechanisms and is so safe that if there's a chance that you're infected with a single-stranded RNA virus, it's a good bet that it would reduce”

“one of the things that unfolded in discussion about, hey, it's a single-stranded RNA virus, ivermectin is probably pretty useful, is there was a lot of pushback. There was the usual stuff about there's no evidence that, which is meaningless, especially the real problem for them with ivermectin is that it's so safe that the argument against giving it to”

“It doesn't just work on RNA viruses. It also works on helmets. It all, like, it works on so many things. And the idea that what you need, even though we've previously put this as one of our top medicines to use, if, you know, To use, both because it tends to be safe and it tends to be effective”

“with a drug this safe, and it is as safe as any drug out there, the, you know, was it given to the people on the ship? It would be an obvious thing to do.”

“people are still confused about, about ivermectin, a drug which, for reasons I'm unclear on, is So safe that it is almost impossible to take enough of it to do significant damage to yourself.”

“If you allow people to use ivermectin, they will discover how effective it is against COVID. Why? Because like hydroxychloroquine, it is actually generally useful over RNA viruses.”

“Even still, if you go to the papers in which they showed that ivermectin was ineffective against COVID, these RCTs that we treat with religious reverence for no good reason. The papers actually say that even when you set up a study to fail, ivermectin is so effective that it still works. You have to look at the data. You”

“I remember when we got to the story of ivermectin. I remember literally saying, what the fuck is this? Why would, why would we not be using a drug that has as much promise as this does in this case?”

“Whatever is going on with ivermectin, it's not saving bucket loads of really sick people. If it was, we'd see it clearly in the data, and we don't. ... the best data we have tells us that ivermectin really isn't doing much here.”

“when we got better studies later on with thousands of people, we found out that ivermectin did not work for COVID.”