Tyler Robinson murder suspect regret after Charlie Kirk case
Left 47%
Center 20%
Right 33%
7 left · 3 center · 5 right
What happened
On July 9, 2026, in Fourth District Court in Provo, Utah, prosecutors used the fourth day of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing to play a redacted interview with Lance Twiggs, Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner. Robinson, 23, is charged with aggravated murder in the Sept. 10, 2025, fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk, a conservative activist and Turning Point USA co-founder, at Utah Valley University; he has not entered a plea, and Judge Tony Graf is deciding whether there is probable cause for a trial. Twiggs told investigators that Robinson returned to their St. George apartment after the shooting, confirmed messages and a note admitting responsibility, cried, said he wished “he hadn’t done it,” and said he planned to turn himself in. Prosecutors displayed text messages in which Robinson allegedly wrote “I am, I’m sorry” when asked if he was the shooter, said “I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out,” and said he had planned for “a bit over a week”; they also cited a note saying, “I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I’m going to take it.” Prosecutors also presented evidence about a bolt-action rifle recovered near the campus, engraved ammunition, and DNA testing they said linked Robinson to the weapon and cartridges, while the defense challenged aspects of the evidence and argued that public release of Twiggs’ statements could prejudice Robinson’s right to a fair trial.
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
NBC, the Guardian and the BBC all put Robinson’s alleged remorse at the center: NBC’s headline says he “expressed regret,” the Guardian says he wished “he hadn’t done it,” and the BBC says he “cried at their apartment afterwards and expressed regret.” The main right-leaning stories do not foreground that quote. The Federalist says Twiggs described Robinson “pacing and acting erratically” before turning himself in, OAN focuses on texts saying “I am” the shooter, and the New York Post emphasizes weeks of planning and engraved ammunition. On the narrow question of regret, the left-side accounts are more direct and complete.
The clearest language split is over Lance Twiggs. NBC calls Twiggs Robinson’s “roommate” and “romantic partner”; the BBC uses “ex-roommate and romantic partner”; the Guardian says “then roommate, with whom he was romantically involved” and notes Twiggs has also gone by “Luna.” The Federalist opens with “roommate and ‘transgender’ lover,” while the New York Post repeatedly says “trans lover.” OAN stays closer to the neutral phrasing, calling Twiggs a “then-roommate and romantic partner.”
There is also a hard omission in the other direction: the Guardian and BBC say Twiggs was granted immunity from prosecution in exchange for cooperating or giving statements. NBC does not include that detail, and neither do the Federalist, New York Post or OAN pieces quoted here. That matters because Twiggs is the source for the alleged regret and confession account.
The Federalist gives major space to a separate evidentiary track largely absent from the left-side writeups: Pastor David Engelhardt’s statement on Kirk’s “orthodox-Christian position on marriage, family, gender, and sexual being” and the prosecution’s “victim targeting enhancement.” Left-side stories describe Kirk as a conservative activist, Trump ally, TPUSA co-founder, or “far-right pundit,” but they do not unpack that religious-belief exhibit. The obvious unanswered question across the coverage is why Twiggs was interviewed again on April 20, months after the September shooting; the Guardian notes both interview dates, but no outlet explains what prompted the later interview.
Bottom line
The same hearing became two different stories: NBC, the Guardian and the BBC led with “he hadn’t done it,” while the Federalist and New York Post leaned into Twiggs’s identity, engraved bullets, and Kirk’s beliefs. One key witness fact cut across the divide unevenly: only the Guardian and BBC state that Twiggs received immunity.
The Left View
Left-leaning outlets framed the hearing mainly as a developing criminal proceeding in which prosecutors introduced potentially significant but still untested evidence. NBC, the BBC, the Guardian, and the New York Times emphasized cautious legal language — Robinson is “accused,” has not entered a plea, and the hearing is about whether the case can proceed to trial — while focusing on Twiggs’ account of regret and the alleged admissions. They also highlighted the procedural fight over transparency versus prejudice: the defense warned that prosecutors would portray Twiggs’ statements as a confession, while Kirk’s family and media lawyers argued for public access to exhibits. The Guardian and BBC added context that Twiggs received immunity and was not accused of involvement, and several left-leaning accounts noted the defense’s challenges to DNA reliability rather than treating forensic claims as settled.
The Right View
Right-leaning outlets framed the same hearing as strengthening the case that Kirk was deliberately assassinated for ideological reasons. The Federalist emphasized the victim-targeting enhancement and highlighted testimony about Kirk’s Christian and conservative beliefs, arguing that the evidence supports the contention that Robinson targeted Kirk for his “political expression.” The New York Post and OAN used more forceful language around premeditation, focusing on the alleged planning period, the engraved ammunition, the note, and the text “I am, I’m sorry.” Right-leaning sources also gave more prominence to Twiggs’ gender identity and relationship with Robinson, using phrases such as “transgender lover” or “trans lover,” and portrayed the Kirk family’s push to see exhibits as part of a broader demand for transparency.
Our Take (balanced)
The strongest left-leaning argument is the due-process point: the evidence is being aired at a preliminary stage, Robinson has not entered a plea, Twiggs’ statements came from an immunized witness, and the judge himself limited some disclosure to balance transparency with fair-trial rights. The strongest right-leaning argument is that the prosecution’s evidence, if credited, points beyond a spontaneous act: the alleged note, admission texts, planning timeline, engraved ammunition, motive language about Kirk’s “hatred,” and DNA evidence all support a theory of premeditation and targeted killing. The central unresolved tension is how strongly the public can interpret motive and culpability from preliminary-hearing evidence while the court is still deciding admissibility, reliability, and whether Robinson’s trial rights have been protected.
15 sources
- Charlie Kirk assassination suspect expressed regret after shooting, roommate says
- Charlie Kirk assassination suspect expressed regret after shooting, roommate says
- Prosecutors Show New Evidence in Charlie Kirk Case
- Ex-roommate: Charlie Kirk killing suspect said he wished "he hadn't done it"
- Suspect in Charlie Kirk killing said ‘he wishes he hadn’t done it’, roommate testifies
- Kirk Killing Suspect Confessed and Voiced Regret, Former Partner Says
- Charlie Kirk murder suspect told roommate 'he wishes he hadn't done it', court hears
- Here’s What You Need To Know About The Charlie Kirk Assassination Trial, Day 4
- Here’s What You Need To Know About The Charlie Kirk Assassination Trial, Day 4
- Tyler Robinson spent weeks plotting Charlie Kirk assassination, asked trans lover about engraver tool for bullets: bombshell recording
- New Testimony Builds Case That Charlie Kirk Was Assassinated For Christian Belief
- Robinson’s prior text messages to Twiggs: ‘I had enough of’ Charlie Kirk’s ‘hatred’ … ‘I am’ the shooter
- 7/9: CBS Evening News
- Charlie Kirk shooting suspect's former roommate interview released
- Charlie Kirk shooting suspects' former roommate interview released
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.