OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Tyler Robinson murder suspect regret after Charlie Kirk case

15 sources · updated 2026-07-11
Left 47% Center 20% Right 33%
7 left · 3 center · 5 right

What happened

On July 9, 2026, in Fourth District Court in Provo, Utah, prosecutors used the fourth day of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing to play a redacted interview with Lance Twiggs, Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner. Robinson, 23, is charged with aggravated murder in the Sept. 10, 2025, fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk, a conservative activist and Turning Point USA co-founder, at Utah Valley University; he has not entered a plea, and Judge Tony Graf is deciding whether there is probable cause for a trial. Twiggs told investigators that Robinson returned to their St. George apartment after the shooting, confirmed messages and a note admitting responsibility, cried, said he wished “he hadn’t done it,” and said he planned to turn himself in. Prosecutors displayed text messages in which Robinson allegedly wrote “I am, I’m sorry” when asked if he was the shooter, said “I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out,” and said he had planned for “a bit over a week”; they also cited a note saying, “I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I’m going to take it.” Prosecutors also presented evidence about a bolt-action rifle recovered near the campus, engraved ammunition, and DNA testing they said linked Robinson to the weapon and cartridges, while the defense challenged aspects of the evidence and argued that public release of Twiggs’ statements could prejudice Robinson’s right to a fair trial.
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

NBC, the Guardian and the BBC all put Robinson’s alleged remorse at the center: NBC’s headline says he “expressed regret,” the Guardian says he wished “he hadn’t done it,” and the BBC says he “cried at their apartment afterwards and expressed regret.” The main right-leaning stories do not foreground that quote. The Federalist says Twiggs described Robinson “pacing and acting erratically” before turning himself in, OAN focuses on texts saying “I am” the shooter, and the New York Post emphasizes weeks of planning and engraved ammunition. On the narrow question of regret, the left-side accounts are more direct and complete. The clearest language split is over Lance Twiggs. NBC calls Twiggs Robinson’s “roommate” and “romantic partner”; the BBC uses “ex-roommate and romantic partner”; the Guardian says “then roommate, with whom he was romantically involved” and notes Twiggs has also gone by “Luna.” The Federalist opens with “roommate and ‘transgender’ lover,” while the New York Post repeatedly says “trans lover.” OAN stays closer to the neutral phrasing, calling Twiggs a “then-roommate and romantic partner.” There is also a hard omission in the other direction: the Guardian and BBC say Twiggs was granted immunity from prosecution in exchange for cooperating or giving statements. NBC does not include that detail, and neither do the Federalist, New York Post or OAN pieces quoted here. That matters because Twiggs is the source for the alleged regret and confession account. The Federalist gives major space to a separate evidentiary track largely absent from the left-side writeups: Pastor David Engelhardt’s statement on Kirk’s “orthodox-Christian position on marriage, family, gender, and sexual being” and the prosecution’s “victim targeting enhancement.” Left-side stories describe Kirk as a conservative activist, Trump ally, TPUSA co-founder, or “far-right pundit,” but they do not unpack that religious-belief exhibit. The obvious unanswered question across the coverage is why Twiggs was interviewed again on April 20, months after the September shooting; the Guardian notes both interview dates, but no outlet explains what prompted the later interview.
Bottom line

The same hearing became two different stories: NBC, the Guardian and the BBC led with “he hadn’t done it,” while the Federalist and New York Post leaned into Twiggs’s identity, engraved bullets, and Kirk’s beliefs. One key witness fact cut across the divide unevenly: only the Guardian and BBC state that Twiggs received immunity.

The Left View
Left-leaning outlets framed the hearing mainly as a developing criminal proceeding in which prosecutors introduced potentially significant but still untested evidence. NBC, the BBC, the Guardian, and the New York Times emphasized cautious legal language — Robinson is “accused,” has not entered a plea, and the hearing is about whether the case can proceed to trial — while focusing on Twiggs’ account of regret and the alleged admissions. They also highlighted the procedural fight over transparency versus prejudice: the defense warned that prosecutors would portray Twiggs’ statements as a confession, while Kirk’s family and media lawyers argued for public access to exhibits. The Guardian and BBC added context that Twiggs received immunity and was not accused of involvement, and several left-leaning accounts noted the defense’s challenges to DNA reliability rather than treating forensic claims as settled.
The Right View
Right-leaning outlets framed the same hearing as strengthening the case that Kirk was deliberately assassinated for ideological reasons. The Federalist emphasized the victim-targeting enhancement and highlighted testimony about Kirk’s Christian and conservative beliefs, arguing that the evidence supports the contention that Robinson targeted Kirk for his “political expression.” The New York Post and OAN used more forceful language around premeditation, focusing on the alleged planning period, the engraved ammunition, the note, and the text “I am, I’m sorry.” Right-leaning sources also gave more prominence to Twiggs’ gender identity and relationship with Robinson, using phrases such as “transgender lover” or “trans lover,” and portrayed the Kirk family’s push to see exhibits as part of a broader demand for transparency.
Our Take (balanced)
The strongest left-leaning argument is the due-process point: the evidence is being aired at a preliminary stage, Robinson has not entered a plea, Twiggs’ statements came from an immunized witness, and the judge himself limited some disclosure to balance transparency with fair-trial rights. The strongest right-leaning argument is that the prosecution’s evidence, if credited, points beyond a spontaneous act: the alleged note, admission texts, planning timeline, engraved ammunition, motive language about Kirk’s “hatred,” and DNA evidence all support a theory of premeditation and targeted killing. The central unresolved tension is how strongly the public can interpret motive and culpability from preliminary-hearing evidence while the court is still deciding admissibility, reliability, and whether Robinson’s trial rights have been protected.

15 sources

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.