Trump vows bomb contingency plan if assassinated by Iran
Left 17%
Center 17%
Right 67%
1 left · 1 center · 4 right
What happened
On Friday, July 10, 2026, President Donald Trump told the New York Post he had left instructions for the U.S. to “literally bomb [Iran] at levels that they’ve never seen before” if Iran assassinated him. He said Iran had targeted him “for a long time” and, when asked about reports that Israel had warned of a new Iranian plot, said, “Israel came up with nothing.” CBS News reported on July 11 that Trump threatened to “decimate and destroy” Iran if it tried to assassinate him; Bloomberg reported his warning as a threat to “completely decimate and destroy all areas” of Iran if its leaders attempted or carried out an assassination. The threats referenced a years-long conflict after Trump ordered the January 2020 U.S. strike that killed Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani, for which Iranian officials and state media have repeatedly threatened revenge against Trump.
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
Bloomberg’s version is a one-sentence account: Trump warned that the US military would “completely decimate and destroy all areas” of Iran if its leaders “attempted or carried out” his assassination. OAN, Daily Caller and Fox instead center the New York Post interview line that he had “left instructions” to “literally bomb them at levels that they’ve never seen before.” That “left instructions” contingency detail, the New York Post sourcing, and Trump’s line “I’ve been No. 1” on Iran’s kill list appear across the right-leaning pieces but not in Bloomberg’s brief item.
The reverse gap is the exact escalation phrase. Bloomberg and CBS both use “decimate and destroy,” while OAN, Daily Caller and Fox do not quote that formulation; they use the “bomb them at levels” wording instead. The same underlying threat is framed as “Decimate Iran” in Bloomberg’s headline, “left instructions to ‘bomb’ Iran” in Fox, “contingency plan” in Daily Caller, and “Operation B**** Slap” in OAN. OAN also adds especially charged phrasing — “Iran’s apparent thirst for Trump’s blood” — that has no counterpart in Bloomberg or CBS.
The right-leaning stories add a large amount of context Bloomberg omits: the alleged Israeli warning, Trump’s denial that “Israel came up with” a new threat, the 2020 Qasem Soleimani strike, funeral posters or chants calling for Trump’s death, and domestic assassination threats such as Butler and West Palm Beach. Daily Caller adds a caution the others do not: CNN reported the alleged Israeli intelligence was “neither clear nor vetted” and that the US “had not been tracking” the plot beforehand.
None of the pieces answers the procedural question: who, legally and operationally, would be authorized to execute Trump’s claimed standing instruction to bomb Iran if he were assassinated?
Bottom line
Bloomberg and CBS compress the story to “decimate and destroy,” while OAN, Daily Caller and Fox build it around a post-assassination instruction to “literally bomb them at levels that they’ve never seen before.” The biggest gap is not the threat itself, but whether readers are told about the claimed contingency order and the thinly described Israeli-intelligence trigger.
The Left View
Bloomberg framed the story around the scale and breadth of Trump’s threatened retaliation. Its emphasis was on a sitting president warning that the U.S. military response would devastate Iran if its leadership attempted or carried out an assassination. The left-leaning framing treated the remarks chiefly as an escalation in presidential rhetoric and focused less on the surrounding threat-history context than on the sweeping military consequence Trump described.
The Right View
Right-leaning outlets framed the remarks as a contingency plan and deterrent response to a long-running Iranian assassination threat. Fox News and the Daily Caller emphasized the established Soleimani-related revenge context, while OAN used a more combative presentation, including the reported adviser nickname “Operation B**** Slap.” These sources also highlighted public Iranian threats against Trump, reports of Israeli intelligence about a possible plot, and Trump’s statement that no new Israeli warning changed his view because he had long considered himself Iran’s top target.
Our Take (balanced)
The strongest left-side argument is that the scale of the stated retaliation is the central news value: Trump described posthumous instructions for massive U.S. bombing, and Bloomberg/CBS highlighted language about “decimate and destroy” consequences. The strongest right-side argument is that the remarks sit within a documented threat context: Trump ordered the Soleimani strike, Iranian officials and media have repeatedly threatened revenge, and recent reports described additional assassination concerns. The central unresolved tension is whether the statement is best understood as deterrent clarity after years of threats, or as escalatory rhetoric that blurs the line between retaliation for an assassination and broad punishment of Iran.
6 sources
- Trump Vows to Decimate Iran If It Carries Out Assassination Plot
- ‘Operation B**** Slap’: Trump outlines plans to bomb Iran if he’s assassinated
- REPORT: Trump Reveals Contingency Plan In Event Of Assassination By Iran
- Trump says he left instructions to 'bomb' Iran 'at levels' never seen if he is assassinated
- Trump warns US military will ‘destroy all areas of Iran’ in the event he’s assassinated by regime: ‘1,000 Missiles Locked and Loaded’
- 7/11: CBS Saturday Morning
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.