OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Trump-backed Andy Biggs wins Arizona governor GOP primary

5 sources · updated 2026-07-22
Left 60% Center 20% Right 20%
3 left · 1 center · 1 right

What happened

On July 21, 2026, in Arizona, the Associated Press and NBC News projected that Rep. Andy Biggs won the Republican primary for governor, defeating Rep. David Schweikert and businessmen Scott Neely and Ken Miceli; Fox News reported that Biggs had more than 70% of the vote when the AP called the race with just under half counted. Biggs, a five-term congressman from Arizona’s 5th District, former House Freedom Caucus chair and Donald Trump-endorsed candidate, will face Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs in the November 2026 general election. Hobbs, who won the Arizona governorship in 2022 by less than 1 percentage point against Republican Kari Lake, ran unopposed in the Democratic primary. Arizona voted for Joe Biden in 2020 and Trump in 2024; Democrats hold the governor’s office, both U.S. Senate seats, secretary of state and attorney general offices, while Republicans hold six of the state’s nine U.S. House seats. Biggs has questioned Biden’s 2020 victory, supported Trump’s unproven election-fraud claims, and was subpoenaed by the now-defunct House Jan. 6 committee over alleged involvement in efforts to overturn the 2020 election; more than one-third of Arizona voters are registered outside the two major parties, and both Cook Political Report and Sabato’s Crystal Ball rate the governor’s race as leaning Democratic.
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Fox gave the clearest numerical account of the primary result: Biggs “captured the GOP nomination” with “more than 70% of the vote,” with David Schweikert at “17%,” Scott Neely at “7%,” and Ken Miceli at “5.4%” when AP called the race with just under half the vote counted. NBC, the Guardian, and the New York Times did not give vote shares; the Guardian used “easily won” and “trounced,” while NBC said only that Biggs won and had led in polling. The left-leaning accounts gave much more space to Biggs’ 2020-election record. NBC wrote that Biggs “had long questioned the legitimacy of Joe Biden’s victory” and quoted him dodging a recent question about it. The Guardian called him “a central figure in the effort to overturn Trump’s election defeat” and described Arizona as “ground zero” for election denialism. Fox did not mention 2020, election denialism, Jan. 6, or efforts to overturn the result. Fox included a primary-campaign attack that the left-side stories did not: Schweikert’s mailers “accusing Biggs of associating with white supremacist and antisemitic groups,” and Biggs’ response calling it “a desperate tactic.” By contrast, NBC included a late Biggs repositioning absent from Fox: his claim that “if you look to collaborate, you can find points and ways to collaborate,” framed around Arizona’s large independent-voter bloc. The labeling diverged. The Guardian called Biggs “hard-right”; Fox called him a “firebrand”; NBC called him “a former chair of the conservative House Freedom Caucus”; the New York Times called him “a conservative Republican and an ally of the president.” Trump’s role also got different framing: Fox led with Trump’s “kingmaker status” and said he “easily passed the test,” while NBC warned that the “Trump dynamic could play differently” in the general election. None of the accounts gives final raw vote totals or turnout, so readers can’t tell the size of Biggs’ win in ballots rather than percentages or descriptors.
Bottom line

Fox quantified the rout — “more than 70%” for Biggs and 17% for Schweikert — while NBC and the Guardian more fully tied Biggs to 2020-election disputes; each side supplied a major piece the other left out.

The Left View
Left-leaning sources framed Biggs’s win as the Republican base choosing a hard-right Trump ally in a state where Trump-aligned candidates have often struggled in competitive statewide races. NBC emphasized the possible general-election liability of Trump’s endorsement in a state with a large independent electorate, while noting Biggs’s late effort to present himself as someone who can work across party lines. The Guardian focused more sharply on election denialism, calling Arizona 'ground zero' after 2020 and describing Biggs as a 'central figure' in efforts to overturn Trump’s defeat. These outlets treated the result less as a surprising primary outcome than as a test of whether a candidate closely identified with Trump can expand beyond a conservative primary electorate in a changed Arizona.
The Right View
Fox News framed the outcome as a clear demonstration of Trump’s continued influence in Republican primaries, saying the president’s 'kingmaker status' was on the line and that he 'easily passed the test.' Its coverage stressed Biggs’s overwhelming margin, the expensive and combative nature of the primary, and Schweikert’s attacks tying Biggs to white supremacist and antisemitic groups, which the Biggs campaign called 'a desperate tactic.' Fox also described the general election as a 'high-stakes showdown' and connected Trump’s endorsements in Arizona to broader midterm fights over governorships and control of the House. The right-leaning framing centered on party strength, primary mandate and Trump’s ability to consolidate Republican voters.
Our Take (balanced)
The strongest left-side argument is that Biggs’s primary strength may not translate cleanly to a statewide general election: Arizona has repeatedly elected Democrats to top statewide offices, has a large bloc of unaffiliated voters, and Biggs carries a record tied to Trump’s 2020 election claims. The strongest right-side argument is that Biggs begins the general election with a highly unified Republican base, a dominant primary win, Trump’s endorsement, and a state electorate that returned to Trump in 2024 while still giving Republicans a strong congressional footprint. The central unresolved tension is whether Biggs’s close identification with Trump is mainly an asset that mobilizes Republicans or a liability that helps Democrats hold the center in Arizona.

5 sources

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.