Former Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan sentenced/fined (no prison) for obstructing ICE arrest

The sharpest language split is in labels for Flores-Ruiz and for the sentence. The New York Times calls him an “undocumented immigrant,” Guardian/NBC say “immigrant,” and BBC says “Mexican national”; New York Post, Fox, and Daily Caller all use “illegal immigrant.” On the sentence, New York Post frames it as a “slap on the wrist” and says Dugan “dodged prison time,” while Guardian/BBC say “spared prison” and NBC says “will not serve time in prison.” A concrete omission runs the other way too: Guardian and BBC both report Dugan’s lawyers said the Trump administration sought to “crush” her; none of the right-leaning Dugan articles quoted here includes that trial argument. The right set is also uneven: Fox gives a detailed account including Dugan’s courtroom remarks, character witnesses, the warrant dispute, and the foot chase; New York Post and Daily Caller are much shorter, and the Breitbart item supplied here is not about Dugan at all. One checkable factual tension: Fox says prosecutors “had asked” for 15 to 21 months, while Guardian says the pre-sentence report called for 15 to 21 months and prosecutors “did not recommend a sentence.” The unasked question across the set is concrete: what exactly did courthouse protocol require when immigration agents appeared, and did it authorize using a private jury door?