Charlie Kirk murder suspect trial evidence dispute

BBC gives a detailed account of Day 4: Tyler Robinson’s ex-roommate and romantic partner Lance Twiggs said Robinson admitted by text, "I am" and "I'm sorry," explained that he had "had enough of his hatred," and later cried in their apartment and said he wished he had not done it. BBC also reports the evidence fight around publication of Twiggs’ taped interview and text exchanges: portions were redacted, some were played only in court, lawyers for the media and Erika Kirk were involved, and Judge Tony Graf allowed publication with limits. The Washington Post framing available here is much thinner and broader: its headlines say the roommate "recounts shooting aftermath" and that Robinson wished "he hadn’t done it," with the deck that prosecutors laid out their case on Day 4; it does not mention the quoted texts, the rifle-in-bushes messages, the redaction dispute, the judge’s ruling, Robinson’s lack of plea, the possible death penalty setting, or the earlier DNA-testimony fight described by BBC. There is little left-vs.-left disagreement in wording: both keep attribution cautious, with BBC using "suspect accused of fatally shooting" and WaPo using "man accused of killing." Right-leaning outlets had not covered this as of publication, so their readers would miss not just the roommate’s alleged confession account but also the procedural dispute over what evidence the public could see. The unanswered question is concrete: what exactly was in the redacted or courtroom-only portions of Twiggs’ video statement and text exchanges, and why were those parts withheld?